this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2026
53 points (100.0% liked)

Space

2322 readers
550 users here now

A community to discuss space & astronomy through a STEM lens

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive. This means no harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  2. Engage in constructive discussions by discussing in good faith.
  3. Foster a continuous learning environment.

Also keep in mind, mander.xyz's rules on politics

Please keep politics to a minimum. When science is the focus, intersection with politics may be tolerated as long as the discussion is constructive and science remains the focus. As a general rule, political content posted directly to the instanceโ€™s local communities is discouraged and may be removed. You can of course engage in political discussions in non-local communities.


Related Communities

๐Ÿ”ญ Science

๐Ÿš€ Engineering

๐ŸŒŒ Art and Photography


Other Cool Links


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] Olap@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Wow. This is huge, and puts doubt on ever walking on the moon again. The original plan was obviously nuts with its weird orbits and mad refueling profile, but it was a plan at least! II was due to send astronauts the furthest into space EVER about now also. What is III to accomplish? When could IV fly, and will lunar descent then occur?

[โ€“] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

puts doubt on ever walking on the moon again

Well, for the American space program at least. Not for as long as the US continues to drastically underfund NASA since isn't as useful in weapons manufacturing nowadays.

China is still underway to land astronauts on the moon by 2030 from what I can see, and I'd bet they aren't anywhere near as underfunded as NASA has been

What is III to accomplish?

It will be a practice run in LEO, a la Apollo 9.

When could IV fly, and will lunar descent then occur?

It's currently NET 2028, which is the same year as the old Artemis 3. In terms of schedule, it's like they're inserting an "Artemis 2.5" mission, between Artemis 2 and the crewed lunar landing.