100% AI slop.
this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2026
-21 points (21.6% liked)
aww
27808 readers
79 users here now
A place with minimal rules for stuff that makes you go awww! Feel free to post pics, gifs, or videos of cats, dogs, babies, or anything cute and remember to be kind to others.
AI posts must be labeled [AI] in the title and are limited to one per week.
While posting and commenting in this community, you must abide by instance-wide rules: https://mastodon.world/about
- No racism or bigotry.
- Be civil: disagreements happen, but thatdoes not provide the right to personally insult others.
- No SPAM posting.
- No trolling of others.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Isgen.ai puts that at 88% chance it's made by Stable Diffusion.
Reversely.ai says 99% Ai.
app.illuminarty.ai says 85% probability of being AI.
I'm sorry but the person who posted this is not being honest about how this was made.
AI detectors are categorically useless, and should not even be referenced, let alone relied upon, to tell if something is AI. Treat them with the same level of skepticism you would a lie detector, ie complete fucking quackery. (I can explain this in depth if you'd like, but the long and short is that if an AI were capable of differentiating it's own work from a human's without a watermark, it would also be able to improve it's human mimicry to exactly that same standard it's detecting, thus destroying that capability)
The artist does have a consistent style and if you follow their page back you can see their work and growth detailed like any other actual artist, including in-progress pieces. This isn't AI, the artist's style has simply been stolen and copied by AIs, and now you're faulting the artist for their own work being effectively stolen en mass.
Any context? Do they have a name?