this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2026
76 points (96.3% liked)

Electric Vehicles

2530 readers
90 users here now

Overview:

Electric Vehicles are a key part of our tomorrow and how we get there. If we can get all the fossil fuel vehicles off our roads, out of our seas and out of our skies, we'll have a much better environment. This community is where we discuss the various different vehicles and news stories regarding electric transportation.


Related communities:


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The online car configurator for the 2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E is out—and Ford is officially charging folks an extra $495 if they want a frunk.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rem26_art@fedia.io 33 points 1 month ago (3 children)

The pictures of the Mach E Frunk filled with chicken and shrimp are absolutely killing me lmao.

If the car was $500 cheaper without the frunk, then whatever, i guess, but the article makes it seem like it just costs extra now.

[–] RamenJunkie@midwest.social 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah, WTF is this, are people really eating out of their car's front trunk like this?

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Football tailgate parties.

[–] RamenJunkie@midwest.social 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I mean, still seems gross.

[–] WalleyeWarrior@midwest.social 3 points 1 month ago

I don't see how the smell of shrimp would ever leave when you have 20lbs of it sitting in ice right next to the air intake

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] 1dalm@lemmings.world 19 points 1 month ago (6 children)

I have a MMachE. Honestly the Frunk is not as useful as I imagined it would be (at least Ford's implementation of the Frunk." You have to open it just like you would the hood of your ICE car, which is fine for an ICE car hood, but not very convenient for storage access. As a result, I really don't use it that much.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (11 children)

So in other words, because they fucked up the implementation they think the concept as a whole is bad. Classic incompetence.

Also, I'd be willing to bet the aftermarket could provide a kit with a plastic liner and a modification to the latch that lets it be opened from outside the car for $495 or less.

Edit: ITT: pearl-clutching fearmongers who hate property rights (such as the right to modify).

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] excursion22@piefed.ca 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I use the one in my Ioniq 5 for storage of the more emergency/just in case items. Scissor jack, tire repair kit, that sort of stuff. You're right, it's not great for storage you'd want to access often, but it's nice for those types of things.

[–] 1dalm@lemmings.world 4 points 1 month ago

That's basically what I use mine for. I work in environmental engineering and am very often on construction sites. So I use it to store my PPE bag.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

They fit a severed head, two arms.

[–] CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Wow, I didn't know that. The Rivian has a button that just opens the frunk with hydrolics. Seems like Ford just wanted it to be as close to an ICE vehicle as possible, maybe for manufacturing reasons?

[–] 1dalm@lemmings.world 2 points 1 month ago

It was almost certainly for manufacturing/cost reasons.

Not having it be hydraulic probably saves $2k per unit.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] cogitase@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 month ago

The empty space between the components in the frunkless version makes it look like they would be a lot easier to access for DIY repair. Certainly easier access to the 12 V battery would be an improvement.

[–] KnitWit@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

No wonder Ford had to scale back their EVs, they weren’t properly advertising the shrimp cocktail bar frunk!

[–] dom@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Surprised its not a monthly subscription. /s

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Shhhhhhh! O crap what if they heard u

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RickyRigatoni@piefed.zip 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

i honestly can't tell if this is a joke article or not

[–] schizoidman@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 month ago (3 children)
[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 month ago

$500 for a plastic basket.

wE tRiEd To mAkE eVs bUt nO oNe iS bUyInG tHeM

[–] RickyRigatoni@piefed.zip 5 points 1 month ago

All the pictures of frunk food were throwing me off

[–] mech@feddit.org 4 points 1 month ago

Trying to sell that thing as a "Mustang" should be a crime.

[–] TomMasz@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Frunk? Am I the only one who had no idea this was a word?

[–] burble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Front trunk

I think Tesla popularized it

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] mech@feddit.org 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

In a beetle, it was just called Kofferraum.
And it was actually useful:

[–] WalleyeWarrior@midwest.social 2 points 1 month ago

That's more useful than the actual trunk on my 2004 Beetle

[–] burble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago

I meant that Tesla recently popularized the term "Frunk" and made it more widespread with EV buyers.

I don't want to take anything away from Beetles and 911s.

[–] jodanlime@midwest.social 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I'm pretty sure it's related to a FUPA.

No but for real, just call it a bonnet like in the old days you cock wombles. We already had a word for this, and frunk is worse.

[–] Schmuppes@lemmy.today 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Bonnet and frunk are not the same thing, though. In the same way that trunk lid and trunk are not the same thing.

[–] jodanlime@midwest.social 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Bonnet bay? Bonnet storage? Idk but frunk ain't it.

[–] fascicle@leminal.space 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] jodanlime@midwest.social 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah, much better. Bronkin'

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

The UK calls this ‘froot’.

Gewd jerb, UK.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] apftwb@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

~~You all need to at least skim the article.~~

~~If you don't pay for the frunk, its not leaving a void or locking your hood. Its a completely different configuration that uses the space.~~

Edit: New opinion: New frunk is too shallow to be practical, only a small set of their customers want it, and Ford wants to reduce cost of the base model.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The article says that even with the frunk, the space has dropped from 4.7 cubic feet to 2.6. Are you sure the stuff in your picture isn't low enough that the 2.6 cubic feet of storage couldn't fit above it?

[–] apftwb@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I think its a completely different configuration. I don't think a frunk tray could fit above it. The components in the photo don't appear to be densely packed so I think a lot of the empty volume exists between those components. With the frunk, they are likely routing cables and tubes around the 2.6 cubic foot frunk.

Edit: Here is a shrimp-less photo of the small 2025 Mustang Mach-E frunk (a sentence only possible in 2026)

https://fordauthority.com/2024/12/2025-ford-mustang-mach-e-gets-smaller-frunk-due-to-heat-pump/

Edit2: going back and forth between photos and also understanding the 2025/2026 models are different, I think it might only be a slightly different configuration or simply such a shallow frunk that its arguably not usable and hard for Ford to justify keeping it with the base model.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I'm not convinced. I'd like to see a picture of the frunk-less version from a different angle where the perspective isn't flattened.

Even as it is, though, I see the same shape in the frunkless version as I do in the frunk.

(Also, why would Ford design a second mechanical configuration, when they already had to make it more compact for the version with the frunk anyway? It doesn't make sense for it to be different because designing two things with two different BOMs and assembly processes costs way more than just letting it all be the same.)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

That bay looks like it was designed by high schoolers for a class project. Where the fuck do Ford hire engineers from, the Learning Annex parking lot?

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago
[–] RockBottom@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago

OT, but why is this a Mustang and not a Model T?

load more comments
view more: next ›