this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2026
208 points (100.0% liked)

Memes of Production

1180 readers
1199 users here now

Seize the Memes of Production

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the “ML” influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Rules:
Be a decent person.
No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, zionism/nazism, and so on.

Other Great Communities:

founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
 
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 23 minutes ago (1 children)

This is not liberal publication.

It's owned by someone who sniffs Trump's farts for fun. And some of those farts, guys... They aren't farts. They are an oval office special.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 2 points 17 minutes ago

That’s liberalism. Americans think liberal means social liberalism, which is still a branch of capitalist ideology but makes some platitudes to social freedoms.

[–] tyler@programming.dev 34 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

In what world is the Wall Street Journal liberal in any sense of the word?

[–] kerrigan778@lemmy.blahaj.zone 30 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, the actual international meaning of the word. But yeah, not in US usage of liberal vs conservative

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 19 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Their news coverage is classical liberal, but their op-ed section frequently elevates fascist voices.

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

"But what's the difference, amiright?"

... gods, I'm tired

[–] PugJesus@piefed.social 4 points 7 hours ago

"Liberal" in the broad, 19th century sense that some conservative parties still use it. And socialists, who regard it as broadly applicable to ideologies of capitalist democracy.

[–] PugJesus@piefed.social 3 points 7 hours ago

How convenient that only now (I think this was an article from 2024, but you know what I mean), with Israel's genocide under greater scrutiny than ever, that the WSJ starts "just asking questions" about the usefulness of the term genocide.

[–] ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml 4 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Maybe they'd prefer "Rightsizing the genepool to enable optimal economic performance at scale"