This is not liberal publication.
It's owned by someone who sniffs Trump's farts for fun. And some of those farts, guys... They aren't farts. They are an oval office special.
Seize the Memes of Production
An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the “ML” influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.
Rules:
Be a decent person.
No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, zionism/nazism, and so on.
Other Great Communities:
This is not liberal publication.
It's owned by someone who sniffs Trump's farts for fun. And some of those farts, guys... They aren't farts. They are an oval office special.
That’s liberalism. Americans think liberal means social liberalism, which is still a branch of capitalist ideology but makes some platitudes to social freedoms.
In what world is the Wall Street Journal liberal in any sense of the word?
I mean, the actual international meaning of the word. But yeah, not in US usage of liberal vs conservative
Their news coverage is classical liberal, but their op-ed section frequently elevates fascist voices.
"But what's the difference, amiright?"
... gods, I'm tired
Right? It's ran by News Corp, meaning ran by Murdoch. In case you don't know, he is a right wing, evil lunatic.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Wall_Street_Journal
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dow_Jones_%26_Company
"Liberal" in the broad, 19th century sense that some conservative parties still use it. And socialists, who regard it as broadly applicable to ideologies of capitalist democracy.
How convenient that only now (I think this was an article from 2024, but you know what I mean), with Israel's genocide under greater scrutiny than ever, that the WSJ starts "just asking questions" about the usefulness of the term genocide.
Maybe they'd prefer "Rightsizing the genepool to enable optimal economic performance at scale"