this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2026
48 points (98.0% liked)

No Stupid Questions

46740 readers
747 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] schwim@piefed.zip 21 points 2 days ago

I remember these signs when I was a kid in south FL in the 70s. It was popular to keep the beachgoers out, I don't know if it was to keep the company out of hot water should something happen to the shirtless or shoeless customer while they're in the store or whether it was just a choice in who to serve.

As for your question about pants: Since the "No shirt...." phrase isn't there to make something legally binding but rather a notice to people that this particular business is exercising their right to not serve you, no, you likely won't get served without pants.

[–] rowinxavier@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago

Down here in Australia we constantly have people walking around with thongs (flip flops) or barefoot and in swimwear, so bikini top for women and bare for men. Honestly I don't see a problem with it, I walk around with very minimal shoes now and I used to walk around barefoot most of the time when I was a kid. If you aren't walking on a road with tonnes of broken glass and no footpaths then you are fine. As for people who complain about women having their chest exposed honestly, learn to not stare. It isn't the job of women to cover up so you don't have to put in effort.

Our beach culture is great because it is so laid back. If I had a business near the beach I would assume my customers would be barefoot and topless and make appropriate accommodations including somewhere to clean their feet off and taking care to keep the floor from being sticky. When I lived in the UK I found the constant demand to wear shoes stifling and awful and the USA felt really judgemental and gross.

[–] ruuster13@lemmy.zip 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This confused my literal autistic brain so much growing up in the 90s. I always wondered why they didn't include shorts/pants. Beach culture originated these signs. Bottoms aren't included because women would enter wearing bikini bottoms and they explicitly did not have a problem with that.

[–] isyasad@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I used to think about this a lot too. I think it's just because it's a given that people would wear pants. They only need to clarify shirt & shoes because that's what they expect people are coming in without; they don't need to define their whole dress code because pants are implied.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 6 points 2 days ago

Yeah. If you're Donald Ducking it, you're likely going to have problems getting to the store.

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Nothing is stopping you from going in, just service is up the staff.

[–] credo@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

service is up the staff

Freudian slip?

[–] TomMasz@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

I want to say this came about as a reaction to hippy culture in the '60s, but I'm not really sure. It was definitely around in the '70s, though. America has become more and more relaxed about dressing in public since the '60s so stores and restaurants wouldn't have needed to post such signs prior to that era.

[–] moonshadow@slrpnk.net 6 points 2 days ago

I once trashed a convenience store because after walking four miles barefoot and shirtless in 104 degree heat picking up change they wouldn't sell me a bottle of water and got physical when I went to just leave with it

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I've always been aware they exist, but I don't think I've ever actually seen one in person.

if I am wearing a shirt and shoes but no pants can I still enter?

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

I believe that the no shirt no shoes was originally targeted at rural areas where someone might be working on the farm and come in as they were to buy some groceries. Time? Probably 1950s with the larger health and hygiene movements of the time.

[–] Sequentialsilence@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

The no shirt part was a result of the hipster movement in the 1970’s, and that’s originally how it was for over a decade. The no shoes part was because of lawyers and liability, hence why sandals are allowed, but barefoot is not.

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yes, but indecent exposure is already illegal

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Not wearing a shirt isn't indecent exposure if you appear masculine.

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

True, but the sign doesn't say pants!

Indecent exposure already has that covered. Now it’s just the rest of the clothes.

[–] Nemo@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 days ago

To quote Wally Pleasant:

🎵
I walked into a store has a sign said "No shirt no shoes no service"
I was wearing a shirt and shoes, but still I was nervous
Everyone got silent when I walked into the room
They were all staring at my fruit... of the loom
Pants! Who the hell needs 'em?

Honestly, if it's something we do in the USA and I don't know WHY we do it, I chalk it up to racism anymore.

That said, I can see a legitimate reason for the shoes deal with how easy glass is to break and it was a heavily used container before plastics became popular. Other than that, I don't see a health reason to no shirt.

[–] bluGill@fedia.io 2 points 2 days ago

It has been around long as I can remember, and I'm in my 50s...

The shoes part is because if someone breaks some glass and are in process of cleaning it up when you walk in they are worried they could get sued for you stepping on it. It isn't clear how realistic this worry is. Anyone can sue for anything though, and even if the law/facts are such that they would clearly win they can still spend millions on lawyers to win that case. No shoes is a bypass - if you drop your case we won't press criminal trespassing charges against you.

I don't know what the shirt thing is about. The US culture allows topless men in public, but not topless women in general, but some people are still offended by topless men so I guess. I do recall back when I worked in retail a few people did come in without a shirt and we asked them to put it on (when it was obviously tied around their waist) or told them to take their order to go - it wasn't a big deal.

[–] IWW4@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago

I don’t know when it became a norm. I first noticed those signs in beach communities in the 70s and that never made any sense. It is the beach..

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 1 points 2 days ago

Fucking prude Christians...

[–] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 1 points 2 days ago

Recently, I have read that anyone who fancies themselves wears pants even when working from home 😉

[–] BuboScandiacus@mander.xyz 0 points 2 days ago

Why would you go to the store shirt and shoeless ? Why this specific combo ? Does it have something to do against people in swim trunks at the beach ? Then if somebody is wearing a bikini top, does it count as a shirt ?