this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2026
278 points (98.9% liked)

politics

29525 readers
1799 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The decision does not affect all of Trump's tariffs but invalidates those implemented using an emergency law.

Delivering a major blow to President Donald Trump, the Supreme Court on Friday ruled that he exceeded his authority when imposing sweeping tariffs using a law reserved for a national emergency.

The justices, divided 6-3 held that Trump's aggressive approach to tariffs on products entering the United States from across the world was not permitted under a 1977 law called the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).

all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dizzle18@lemmy.zip 89 points 2 months ago (7 children)

Cool. Will we get our fucking money back? Don’t worry, I already know the answer to that.

[–] shittydwarf@sh.itjust.works 53 points 2 months ago

A trump never pays his debts

[–] anon6789@lemmy.world 28 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yes, but it has been accepted as your contribution to the Board of Peace. Thank you for your donation.

[–] dizzle18@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It’s almost as big a joke as The Human Fund.

[–] anon6789@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

At least The Human Fund didn't actually have George stealing from anyone, it was just him being a jerk. When Mr. Kruger gave him that big check he at least somewhat came clean it was fake. The president taking tax money for his League of Villians is just outright theft like if George would have cashed the check and called the accountant a liar.

[–] Hylactor@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

He was in the process of his considerations when Kruger calls him into the office to inform him that accounting noticed that the human fund doesn't exist. George just didn't have enough time before getting caught to adequately convince himself to cash it.

[–] anon6789@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Lol, you are correct, I just rewatched it. He was debating with Jerry at the dinner about turning it into a "real charity" which quickly devolved into people showering him with praise in order show worthiness of his "generosity" (jeez, this is sounding like how I imagine the Board of Peace will operate...). When Kruger calls him in, he still chickens out and gives the money back unprompted and plays the victim of religious persecution for his father's celebrating of Festivus instead of Christmas.

I don't know if George would have went through with it, because his cowardice, paranoia, and desire to not actually do anything likely would have won out, so I still think he's less evil as he at least somewhat confesses to being a fraud and he returns the money without a fuss, which doesn't seem like the behavior of a FIFA Peace Prize winner.

[–] zikzak025@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Businesses will get refunds, but not any of the consumers who paid higher prices for the tariffed goods.

I doubt we're likely to see many prices come back down from their tariff-inflated values either.

[–] dizzle18@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago

Like I said, I knew the answer already.

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

In very select circumstances, possibly. I got a refund check from DHS/CBP/whoever for some random thing I imported (which turned out to come from Germany, I discovered after I bought it...) for which I got tariffed personally. I presume after that particular tariff was retracted and/or struck down.

For the vast majority of consumers buying stuff off the shelf from retailers and vendors who jacked their prices up to compensate for said tariffs, no. Absolutely not. I predict said prices will remain jacked up for the foreseeable future as well, since retailer pricing policies are completely opaque to the consumer, and also notoriously ratchet-like — they tend to only move in one direction.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Oh somebody will get money back. Just not the consumer. I almost wonder if this wasn’t the plan all along. All that money will be refunded to the company that “paid” them as they passed the costs on to the consumer. And don’t think for a second that prices for anything will return to pre-tariff levels. Also makes you wonder if that was also by design.

[–] P1nkman@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

If you're a business owner, sure! If you're a customer, fuck off.

Sincerely, Trump

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Nope, Howard lutnick's kid will though.

[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 24 points 2 months ago (2 children)

His own arguments about the tariffs outside of the court defeated his lawyers case completely. Orang turd should learn to keep his mouth shut now that the SC has turned on him and a growing number of Republicans are turning away even the ones not retiring.

[–] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

Dumbfuck has always been a narcissist with no clue when to shut the fuck up the moment he has a position of power over others.

His obvious dementia makes it worse than ever. When the big beautiful day finally comes, we might end up in more danger. Vance isn't as stupid as Trump is.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago (3 children)

We paid the tariffs and now companies can sue to double their profits. Capitalism!

[–] pipi1234@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

And guess who is gonna pay those settlements? Yes, the tax payers.

[–] bluemite@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Don't forget the money going to rebuild Gaza

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I bet he reinstitutes them under the BISSo doctrine (Because I Said So). Why not? He routinely ignores the courts

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

"I hereby order...."

-- Pedonald, after watching The Office, probably

[–] dizzle18@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That’s basically what he just said he’s going to do. Fucking wild.

[–] madde@feddit.org 4 points 2 months ago

Well people and businesses just love to invest in banana republics where the dear leader can change laws every 5 minutes for whatever thing he is just angry about.

[–] Hayduke@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago (2 children)

And the stock market did rejoice. This is all a ball and shell game for us when they know where the ball is.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] lemmy_outta_here@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Sweet! Under that condition, the Trump-Epstein files matter again!

[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, I had the same thought after seeing how the DJIA reacted. A small number of people are going to make a nice bit of money from this. I wonder who. 🤔

[–] 3jane@piefed.ca 3 points 2 months ago

Lutnick for one, he's reportedly been buying up refund rights through one of his companies.

[–] TomMasz@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

I believe I speak for most Americans: Fuck you and your tariffs, you fucking fuck!

[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Well that's a little bit of progress

[–] GutterRat42@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Tariffs are highly unpopular. They are actually doing him a favor.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This was my thought as well. Perhaps the best way to step back from tariffs without looking like chickening out, and about the right time for campaign season to ramp up.

If his admin has any sense of strategy, they'll take the out and then brag about price reductions in summer.

My belief has been they had to totally screw up 2025 to make people feel like 2026 would be getting better. I anticipate too many folks will just see year to year improvement and not reflect on why 2025 was a particularly rough year.

[–] GutterRat42@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

He just fucked it up and is using a different law to impose tariffs

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Inasmuch as Delicate Feelings Donnie immediately hit back with calling the majority justices "fools and dogs" and swearing he was going to find another way to do it regardless, it's clear he personally sees it as a major blow.

But yes, overall, in terms of popularity they removed another rotting albatross from around his neck, unfortunately.

[–] GutterRat42@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

And he just hung it again

[–] green_goglin@thelemmy.club 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

He’s going to need a big distraction for this and all his child raping at the state of the union next week. Should be a fun weekend /s

[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That's where the 'release government files about extraterrestrials' comes in. But that's small fries. He'll need to go a lot bigger than that with the distractions.

[–] green_goglin@thelemmy.club 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

LOL SCOTUS will be seated feet from him in the front row. That being said I’d wager he’ll invade Iran after US markets close today.

~~Edit: possibly at this 12:45 Press Conference he just announced.~~

[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Now that would be a hell of a distraction!

[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago

AaaaaaaaaAlnd he doubles down on more other illegal tarrifs 🙄🙄🙄not one repercussion was had.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago

Good. The only blow that guy deserves is the one he gives to all the people of the world. Enjoy, you broken throat fuck.