this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2026
253 points (99.6% liked)

politics

28571 readers
2460 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 65 points 1 week ago (5 children)

500$/day? fuck that shit. it should be a whole fucking number % of your salary per fucking day

[–] grue@lemmy.world 55 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Never mind a fine; they should be held in custody until they comply.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Exactly, they don't care about fines that they'll never pay. Besides, his salary is chump change. The entire point is to use your office as a platform for corruption that will bring you far, far more. It's not like your boss is going to fire you for stealing.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago

Why not both?

[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Then Trump would just pardon them.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Then they could just immediately hold them in contempt again and put them right back.

More to the point, I'm pretty sure contempt is different from a "federal crime" in the sense that it is an inherent power of the court system, not a law passed by the legislature that was broken. I don't think it actually is pardonable.

[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I think you're getting the inherent contempt power of Congress mixed up with criminal contempt.

Civil or criminal contempt?

There is also the possibility of Trump administration officials being found in criminal contempt - for which the punishment could include jail time.

"That's considered one of the most serious things, and usually the last resort," Prof Tsai said.

In the case of criminal contempt, Prof Tsai said the normal course of events would be to refer the issue for prosecution by the justice >department, which is run by Attorney General Pam Bondi.

Judge Boasberg also has the power to appoint a special prosecutor to pursue criminal contempt charges and to sidestep Bondi, a Trump loyalist who was appointed by the president.

"With this administration, it is very possible that the justice department refuses to prosecute," George Mason University law professor Ilya Somin explained to the BBC.

Even if the justice department does take the case, Trump has the power to pardon a criminal offence. But the president does not have the power to issue pardons for civil liability (civil contempt).

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cg72d3zpj9xo

[–] mr_account@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

I'm fine with it being $500/day at first. Then after a set period of noncompliance (like 1wk), it doubles each day. Even for the 1%, exponential growth is small, until it isn't.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

80% for maximum insult. After taxes, you got nothing.

[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The salary for an Assistant United States Attorney (AUSA) typically starts around $55,204 and can increase significantly with experience, reaching up to a maximum of about $176,200. Salaries may also be adjusted based on local cost of living factors.

So, you'd like it to be (at a minimum) $552 to $1762 per day?

[–] Sprocketfree@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 days ago

It's so depressing to see how cheaply these people sell out

That's 182.5k a year. They'd need to be making several times the average US lawyer salary to shrug that off. Most lawyers don't make that much money post taxes.