this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2026
595 points (99.7% liked)

Political Memes

11088 readers
3063 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] brown567@sh.itjust.works 5 points 20 hours ago

Didn't trump appoint an FBI director with express instructions to find evidence of large-scale election fraud?

And didn't that director, after some investigation, conclude that the system's actually locked down pretty tight and what fraud does happen is so little as to not even show up in the final counts?

[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

TBH, if they're living here, they should be able to vote anyway.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 11 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

At the minimum if they are paying taxes they should be able to vote. Taxation without representation anybody?

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago

Hell no, they pay taxes but get none of the benefits. Just like supply-side Jesus intended.

[–] PhoreTwunny@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Burn down your local chapter of the heritage foundation.

[–] underscores@lemmy.zip 36 points 1 day ago (1 children)

wait, I just realized the mass deportations can be voter manipulation if he targets the right groups

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 47 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Here's one for the road: it's also voter manipulation if legitimate voters are too scared to vote cause they might be targeted.

[–] D_C@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Exactly.
Make it difficult to vote in person. Then invade and terrorise any people that even think about voting against them.

To add more terror they'll murder mothers in their cars (Renee Good) and unarmed nurses (Alex Pretti) to show what may/will happen if you turn up to vote.

And the people saying "don't worry, we'll turn this around at the mid terms" are wondering why they've been laughed at or scorned.
You don't fight a murderous dictatorship this way. You get out there and protest. And start general strikes.
The fat orange child rapist is laughing at all this.

[–] Makeshift@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

While the in-person protests are awesome for how large they are and I feel they're good for spreading the mood, they themselves are ridiculously easy to ignore.

A bunch of people screaming on the street for a few hours. Oh no. Whatever will the administration do? How will they ever defeat that? They can just ignore people! /s

I look at protests as events to reach/inspire people who can actually figure out how to DO something other than ask Fascists to "pwetty pweeese stop :(".

[–] cynar@lemmy.world 3 points 23 hours ago

Protests serve 2 purposes. They act to spread a message and connect people.

They also act as a warning. We are willing to invest effort in this to change things. If you don't change, some of us will put the effort into other methods, some of which are... far more unpleasant for you. We also act as support to the people doing this.

The latter is important. For a good example, look at the Northern Ireland troubles.

[–] D_C@sh.itjust.works 2 points 23 hours ago

Protests can change things if they are big enough and are done correctly.

Which is why I also mentioned a general strike. Protests have already been ignored by the paedo in chief, but it's very difficult to just ignore strikes if they are organised and continued.

[–] ickplant@lemmy.world 53 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Appreciate the sourcing very much, thanks.

[–] inari@piefed.zip 28 points 1 day ago

Sucks when the data doesn't match your prejudices huh

[–] mastertigurius@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

Wait, you don't mean they were making shit up, do you?

[–] danekrae@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wait, isn't that like a billion votes, or is my math wrong?

[–] SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz 6 points 1 day ago

~10 elections with ~100M votes each puts that in the ballpark. Might only be looking at presidential elections?

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

We don't have an election integrity problem; we have a most people in this country have no integrity problem.