this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2026
27 points (96.6% liked)

CSS

715 readers
2 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] andioop@programming.dev 5 points 2 days ago

thanks, this is the stuff I keep my programming.dev account for

[–] fox2263@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Since CSS has changed so much that there are old and new ways of doing things, maybe they should have changed version numbers.

[–] towerful@programming.dev 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 2 days ago
div.mydiv {
  template <Variable mycolor> 
  requires std::is_named_color<mycolor> || is_function_color<mycolor> || is_hexa<mycolor>
  mydiv& background-color: mycolor 
  noexcept( noexcept( background-color: mycolor) || !std::is_IE6 )
  --> decltype (css_declaration<property>)
  ;
}
[–] Kissaki@programming.dev 2 points 2 days ago

Please make them incompatible so that I have to upgrade.

[–] Kissaki@programming.dev 1 points 2 days ago

To what end? What would you expect version numbers to do? How would you specify or use them, which what consequences?

Grouping changes into releases with explicit numbering instead of a living standard with generic @supports checks?

I guess it would make some things easier and more obvious.

[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Do I wanna bet how many of these “““modern””” snippets are Chrome-exclusive?

[–] MimicJar@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

Each snippet clearly states which browsers+version supports it (as well as a general year if all major browsers support it). At a quick glance, with the exception of trying to find an unsupported on Firefox snippet, everything seemed supported by all major browsers.