this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2026
47 points (100.0% liked)

BuyFromEU

6854 readers
9 users here now

Welcome to BuyFromEU - A community dedicated to supporting European-made goods and services!

Feel free to post, comment and vote, be excellent to each other and follow the rules.

We also invite you to subscribe to:

Logo generated with mistral le chat Banner by Christian Lue on unsplash.com

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I use ad blocker and brave on phone to access so it's less cancerous but occasionally I see it unfiltered and good God is it awful.

I love the idea of peertube but it's very awkward to use and people freak out about the P2P streaming. But a fediverse video site seems ideal: smaller instances so no one instance needs to be able to host extreme amounts of data.. although there's always risk that one instance becomes a monopoly and defederates from everything, and we'll have the same issue again (actually I fully expect something like this to happen on fediverse in general).

Dailymotion is one option I guess? But I don't see people talk about it much? Am I missing something?

There's sleebi for ASMR but it's a teeny tiny thing. Still paid for it tho.

None of course matter if there aren't content creators actually making content. On the other hand, on a smaller platform more people have a chance to be seen.

top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] _MusicJunkie@beehaw.org 24 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Unless someone coughs up a few billion euro, no. Hosting video on any sort of scale is incredibly, incredibly expensive.

[–] alfredon996@feddit.it 5 points 3 weeks ago

You need advertising yes or yes to finance that. Sadly Peertube disagrees

[–] 100@fedia.io 3 points 3 weeks ago

only way i can see it happening if it got state subsidies

[–] gandalf_der_12te@feddit.org 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

what about short form content?

[–] Kaeser@det.social 2 points 3 weeks ago

@gandalf_der_12te @_MusicJunkie
I heard of Loops the other day, but i havent used it so...i dont know :D
@loops

[–] sylver_dragon@lemmy.world 20 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Is there anything we could try to get alternatives to YouTube?

Yes, you can pay for it.

If you want "free" then you're going to be stuck with the same ads, tracking and enshitification. If you don't want any of that, you are going to have to crack open your wallet and pay for the privilege. As an example (not an EU one), there's Nebula which is ad free, owned and operated by creators, free of AI slop and mostly free of the usual dross the youtube algorithm pushes. At the same time, it's scope is pretty limited (predominantly science and edu-tainment type content). And there is little guarantee that they will survive and/or grow. I personally have a subscription and keep hoping they succeed, but I also don't expect them to reach anything like the scope of YouTube.

And that sort of thing brings with it another problem: a lack of democratization. One of the things YouTube does is allow nearly anyone to put something up. While the algorithm is hardly kind to new or niche creators, it's still entirely possible for some random person to start posting cat videos as dramas in three acts, and maybe that takes off. With the siloed services, that's never going to happen. Maybe they won't insist on some sort of editorial input, but they are also going to be far more selective in what they platform. So, there is a trade-off to be had.

There is also the BBC model, with a publicly funded service. You're still paying for it, but it's not directly controlled by a corporation with it's shareholders to serve. Though, there might still be the question of opening up the platform for more "niche" creators.

[–] linule@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

“If it’s too good to be true..” (referring to youtube)

[–] parlaptie@feddit.org 1 points 3 weeks ago

I have Nebula but I'm thinking of getting rid of my credit card and it doesn't seem like they have a good alternative payment method. (PayPal is not an alternative)

[–] gandalf_der_12te@feddit.org 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Upvote for the last sentence:

On the other hand, on a smaller platform more people have a chance to be seen.

I thought about how to convince people to use the Fediverse and people always reply "there's so few users, nobody will see my content". But that's in fact not true, because it has few users, your stuff has a higher chance to be seen.

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

But I'm a temporarily embarassed ~~millionaire~~ YouTube sensation!

[–] RottenOneeSan@ani.social 2 points 3 weeks ago

Oh that is a good parallel

[–] dynamoMaus@feddit.org 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Well, there is Peertube. But as mentioned scaling it would be really expensive. So propably a lot of money for Framasoft would help.

[–] linule@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Scaling in what sense? If it’s decentralized there’s no need for massive scaling of individual nodes.

[–] frischkaesbagett@feddit.org 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I thought of scaling more from the user perspective: reaching more people. As i understand peertube/framasoft want to grow to maintain and develop code as well, so 1 node growing a lot would propably help as well.

[–] zarlin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

If you're willing to pay, Nebula is a streaming service setup by creators, without any ads or data harvesting/selling. The revenue goes directly to the creators. Their offer is still small, but quite a few creators I followed on Youtube I now follow there.

[–] tiredofsametab@fedia.io 6 points 3 weeks ago

As a viewer, I like Nebula. As a creator, I can't just "get on nebula" in the sense that I could on youtube (not that my content would fit with most of what they have anyway).

[–] SrMono@feddit.org 3 points 3 weeks ago

While understanding the gist, Nebula LLC is based in america, so it wouldn’t match the buyFromEU idea.

[–] plyth@feddit.org 5 points 3 weeks ago

Start a party or hijack the European Pirate Party and win a majority by promising to spend part of the broadcasting budgets on an European social video network.

Use social pressure by letting all teens pressure their parents, grandparents and neighbours to vote for you with the promise of making that network available to them while all other parties work on shutting them out.

[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 3 points 3 weeks ago

The last decentralised alternative that was somewhat successful was LBRY, but the US government shut them down.

I'd love to see an alternative that uses IPFS, it seems like an ideal way to distribute videos.

[–] mech@feddit.org 3 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

The thing to understand is that YouTube can pay creators without taking money from viewers because it shows you ads, tracks you, and is backed by a huge corporation that can spend lots of money just to stay #1 in that space, and can deal with copyright claims.
There can be no free alternative without ads and tracking.
Even if someone rich enough paid for it with no expectation of profit, as soon as it got too popular, an armada of lawyers would descend upon them to shut it down.

The only real alternative is following creators you like on their Patreon, but then you have to pay them for creating content.

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 4 points 3 weeks ago

The only real alternative is following creators you like on their Patreon, but then you have to pay them for creating content.

It's even worse, I DO follow creators on Patreon, but they usually just use YouTube. The one time I was following one who didn't (because it was sexual content), their hosting solution was crap.

[–] tiredofsametab@fedia.io 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

without taking money from viewers

Youtube premium leads to add free for those that have it which is kinda like taking money.

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 1 points 3 weeks ago

Still tracking you tho.