this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2026
31 points (100.0% liked)

Europe

10173 readers
900 users here now

News and information from Europe πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] plyth@feddit.org 9 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

They only mention that contracts have to go to the cheapest bidder. They don't mention that contracts allow for unexpected work to be charged extra.

As a consequence, companies have specialized in making a cheap offer at first and then add to that much unexpected work. It's not only the insolvency of the cheapest bidder that is a problem.

Anyway, it is known that the regulation to use the cheapest bidder and many other regulations are the problem. So why does the article stop there and does not keep digging?

This is an excuse, paired with hope that the project finishes in autumn. But the problems remain and there is no hope that anything will change. The origin of the problem is not named and also not the people who can change the problem.

[–] zwerg@feddit.org 15 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

They compare with France, specifically Notre Dame. If I recall correctly, the fire that destroyed much of the building happened due to lax procedures during repair work on the roof. That could likely have been prevented with... you guessed it, better regulation. The same kind of regulations that slow down German projects.

[–] BilboBargains@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago

I would imagine it is the same situation everywhere. Does anybody know of a nation that builds on time? Failing that, a big project that didn't overrun? The only example I can think of is soviet rearmament during Barbarossa. You could argue they produced the t34 tank in time to save Moscow. There must be more recent examples that our governments could learn from.

Unless the government is directly managing the project and they are also sufficiently competent to do so, we will always be at the mercy of shady contractors.

[–] Mantzy81@aussie.zone 7 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Interesting, in Australia it's always because if you don't go over your budget, you won't get as much the next year, which means you can't plan for things to get funded. So we purposely spend all of it and then some, plus run jobs over the EOFY (July-June) so we get enough for the next year. If a job is most likely to finish in April, it suddenly isn't until October.

Source: Government employee

[–] birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Wouldn't it then be better if;

β€’ It was looked at how often a company stays within the initially allocated budget
β€’ How often flaws are discovered
β€’ Whether its labour rights are satisfactory

to decide to which company to allocate?

[–] anOminousOtter@piefed.social 4 points 7 hours ago

That certainly happens here in Germany as well. Not sure if itβ€˜s the case in construction as well, but I heard of it happening in mutliple different sectors before

[–] Feddinat0r@feddit.org 8 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] genfood@feddit.org 2 points 8 hours ago

Ist doch was tolles