this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2026
131 points (100.0% liked)

Europe

10173 readers
900 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

At the Munich Security Conference on February 14, President Volodymyr Zelenskyy delivered a wide-ranging speech focused on security guarantees, battlefield realities, Western responsibility, and what he described as the fundamental nature of Russia’s leadership.

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org 19 points 1 day ago (2 children)

He's right. Can someone explain to me why no other country has sent actual troops to counter Putin's invasion?

[–] PixelatedSaturn@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Easy to explain. Most of Europe is in nato and Nato doesn't want a confrontation because that could mean a nuclear end of the world. We let them get help from NK and Iran, because we know those countries can't really help that much. The plan was to give them enough weapons to defend and not all at once, as that would not provoke the end of the world. Until Trump came into office with his love of Putin. Now we can't really give them much unless it's bought from the US, when they let us buy.

We also don't want to give them enough to ruin Russia and risk balkanization of Russia, because then a bunch of nuclear weapons would end up under control of god knows who.

It's not an easy situation. Russia is done. It's economically, culturally, morally devastated. But for a normal future, there is less risk to keep it as is, then have uncontrollable change.

[–] wltr@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So forcing Ukraine to give up its arms, with no history of attacking its neighbours is something normal to do. For nothing, by the way, for a joke of security assurances. Only for Ukraine to observe the US administration to openly be Russian bitches doing whatever the daddy says.

But forcing a balkanised middle of fucking nowhere based bunch of savages, with a history of attacking like, what, twenty neighbours during the previous century alone—

Oh, yeah, that’s impossible for the western world to achieve. Let’s help the Russia as much as we can to never let them lose! Western civilisation is destined to be destroyed then, if it has absolutely no intellect. Not to say even something of values.

Swap those warheads for bananas to save the barbarians from the starvation, when the Russia is small again. Haven’t occurred to you, huh?

[–] PixelatedSaturn@lemmy.world 8 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I'm describing the situation. I never said I support it.

Never said I don't either. It's a complex situation, either way it resolves will greatly impact the world history for decades if not hundreds of years.

[–] wltr@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 13 hours ago

Sorry, didn’t mean to attack you personally, rather this situation and the view. That’s just the point of view, and it’s wrong. It’s what Russia wants you to think, and it uses its fear. Somehow the west wasn’t afraid with Ukraine with no record of attacking neighbours giving up nukes to Russia with the proven record of attacking neighbours, and probably the biggest record during the previous century… somehow nobody thought its wrong. But now, ‘oh no, what if Russia loses and there is no Russia?!’ Fuck it, nukes aren’t going to launch themselves all of a sudden. A tiny regional power with nukes isn’t more dangerous than fucking big stupid Russia is. That’s a myth that benefits Russia.

It’s nice to have the current thinking explained, so thank you for doing that. But it’s this point of view is just wrong. And naive, and it never helps the oppressed, only the oppressor.

[–] Cube6392@beehaw.org 1 points 1 day ago

functionally, the global north's oligarchs all support eachother's agendas. Ukraine is nominally part of the global south based on economic pressures. largely, the liberal position of western europe is to stay out of it to avoid retaliation. this is, of course, a fallacy. russia is an aggressor. no one can be made safe by ignoring their threat and waiting for it to go away. the same can be said for the so called united states, china, and india. but largely europe doesn't want to intervene on the side of the colonized in a colonial war because europe benefits from colonialism more than it doesn't