this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2026
14 points (88.9% liked)

United Kingdom

6580 readers
162 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Tim_Bisley@piefed.social 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] fakeman_pretendname@feddit.uk 2 points 1 month ago

I'm under the impression it's more of a lightweight battery powered tram - but for some reason, the article didn't bother to mention this!

[–] blackn1ght@feddit.uk 1 points 1 month ago

It's a tram.

[–] VibeSurgeon@piefed.social 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coventry_Very_Light_Rail

This has a certain gadgetbahn-smell over it and I remain skeptical.

Ditching catenaries for batteries make the vehicles heavier, requires them to be out of service for a part of the day to recharge and increases capex per vehicle instead of taking the capex on catenaries.

The claims of autonomous driving seem dubious - this usually warrants a level of separation that's rarely afforded to trams. It's possible, but it for sure requires not cheaping out on the infrastructure.

Ditching timetables in favour of some kind of demand-driven dispatch reduces the predictability of the network, and also seems unnecessary if the claims of autonomous driving are actually true. Maybe they have to cheap out on the amount of vehicles when making each vehicle more expensive with the batteries.

Who knows, maybe the numbers work out better than what we can see here, but until then, I remain skeptical. I hope to be proven wrong.

[–] zerakith@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 weeks ago

At the very best there are design choices here that are limiting its overall performance in order to make it cheaper and less invasive to install. Similar to a BRT.

It is possible that there is a use case for lower density areas where the lower costs could help make or break a business case.

To my mind though a city or large town is not the use case we know the answer for that and its regular light rail done consistently and coherently across the country to achieve economies of scale (as they have done in France). Sadly, the UK can't get past its ideology that money spent on public transport infrastructure is a waste whereas it is an investment in functioning economies.