this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2026
240 points (98.8% liked)

Canada

11432 readers
977 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Archived link

New Democrats say the federal government should immediately cancel the order for 88 American F-35 fighter jets and instead buy Swedish-built Gripen planes “to defend the Arctic in partnership with like-minded allied countries.”

“We are here today to send a clear message to Prime Minister Mark Carney. If he meant what he said in Davos, then Canada cannot buy a single F-35. We do not come to this decision lightly,” NDP defence critic Lori Idlout (Nunavut) told reporters at a Feb. 4 press conference in Ottawa.

NDP interim leader Don Davies (Vancouver Kingsway, B.C.) said in the same conference that they are calling on the government to “move swiftly” to negotiate an agreement with Saab to purchase 88 Gripen aircraft instead.

The 2023 deal with American defence contractor Lockheed Martin for 88 jets has a projected cost of $19-billion, while the project's total life-cycle cost is expected to reach $70-billion. The first four jets are slated to be delivered in 2026, with the full fleet to be complete by 2032. The new jets would replace this country's aging CF-18s. Canada has made a legal commitment of funds for the first 16 jets.

“At a time when the Trump administration is threatening our sovereignty, attacking Canadian workers, increasing tariffs on our industries, and interfering in our domestic and foreign policies, going through with any F-35 orders is simply unacceptable,” Davies told reporters.

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] flock_of_nazguls@lemmy.world 10 points 18 hours ago

100% yes. This shouldn't even be a debate.

[–] krunchyiestklown@piefed.ca 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Anything that ties us closer to the EU is a good thing.

Though i'm sure Trump would use the rejection of this contract as a pretext to further escalation against Canada (not that he needs it)

[–] canuck666777@lemmy.ca 8 points 20 hours ago

A little off-topic but important nonetheless: The issue I have has got to do with the River Class Destroyers that Irving Shipbuilding's building for our Navy.

So everything from the radar to missile launch systems, literally everything is Lockheed Martin. One phone call from Trump to LM's CEO and those destroyers will end up becoming fishing trawlers!

We're like sitting ducks here.

[–] noAlanInVancouver@piefed.ca 2 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

Agreed. But Canada has paid full price for 18 (I think 18). We can't just turn our backs on that money.

[–] Greddan@feddit.org 2 points 11 hours ago

The U.S is more likely to deliver F35s to Russia right now. I think Canada has to accept that they got grifted.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 2 points 17 hours ago

Sunk cost fallacy

[–] CannonFodder@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago (1 children)
  1. And we'll take delivery of those. And gain experience using them. Maybe the U.S. will return to sanity in the future and we can move forward with more.