this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2026
236 points (98.8% liked)

Political Memes

11005 readers
2600 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone 45 points 6 days ago (3 children)

I cannot think of a cartoon from my childhood where the people were this evil. All honesty, I think people need to be getting mad and considering how we get rid of rich people.

[–] Zombie@feddit.uk 18 points 6 days ago (1 children)

how we get rid of rich people

🍽️

[–] BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Of course, from a zombie. :)

[–] LadyMeow@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 6 days ago

Look, I support zombie rights to eat the rich, and I’m not ashamed to say it!

[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Have we considered not buying their shit and maybe not voting them into power.

Sam Walton did a wonderful job of killing off most of the mom and pop stores, the internet did in the rest. The method of searching for the seller of Amazon to buy from them doesn't really work, a lot of store fronts use Amazon for storage. So unless you're good at farming, fabrication, injection molding, chip making, etc. you're stuck buying from a large corporation.

[–] pitiable_sandwich540@feddit.org 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

considering how we get rid of rich people.

I think the french considered that same problem around the 18th century... Come to think of it I'm almost certain they developed some kind of contraption for it.

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Might've been. Certainly worth a try.

[–] zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 45 points 6 days ago (3 children)
  • wants to get rid of poor people
  • only able to hire girls who are poor and vulnerable
[–] LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz 16 points 6 days ago

Girls aren't people to them, so it fits.

[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Doesn't want to help people just get rid of them. Lust after a child. These are the good guys though. /s

[–] Kanda@reddthat.com 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

They have a lot of money so they have to be intelligent and virtuous

They sure think they are.

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

They're literally trying to recreate the handmaid's tale, except instead of fashionable robes everyone's gonna get Mormon pajamas.

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 25 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I hate that these fucks' names are redacted. They are actively discussing heinous shit, and getting away with it.

Another example: https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00705860.pdf

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 25 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

By the way that redaction is a federal crime, too. Redacting the names of non-victims in these files was explicitly prohibited by the act that ordered their release. Fascists are screaming at us through their acts that liberalism and legalism will not, cannot prevent or restrain their barbarism. When's the world gonna listen?

[–] Denalduh@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

This one has been figured out https://lemmy.world/comment/21941826

It's Sultan Bin Sulayem.

[–] domdanial@reddthat.com 2 points 5 days ago

That's not a smoking gun, that's a shitty chain email joke. It's slightly suspicious but I need more evidence than that.

[–] Fusselwurm@feddit.org 32 points 6 days ago (2 children)

"getting rid of poor people" could charitably be interpreted as "getting rid of poverty" . I have questions about the part with the under-age girl though…

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 26 points 6 days ago

I wouldn’t be charitable with people who are excited about trafficking and raping children.

[–] Bgugi@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago
[–] Strider@lemmy.world 26 points 6 days ago

It could be so easy, share your wealth then they're not anymore. But noo, we go the Dr. Evil route.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 19 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Come one, they were just misled. Kids are using photoshop to look legal age.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

Prostitution is legal in my country and there's this very well known escort website where you first have to figure out if a girl is 18+ from a single picture with filters.

[–] DarkSideOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 15 points 6 days ago (2 children)

They told us they were only redacting victims names and photos. But a lot of this emails… why names are redacted?

[–] Bgugi@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

Poor guys got diddled by kids (thoughts and prayers)

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

They consider their own monsters the "real victims"

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 15 points 6 days ago (1 children)

And once again it's not about Trump, though I'm sure he's in it with no less disgusting communications, pictures, maybe even moving pictures.

We already know that Jeffrey was a horrible human being.

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 12 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I don’t care if it’s about Trump or not. We already know he’s guilty. He’s proven himself to be a vile man ever since he entered the public light back in the fucking 70s.

These names need to be unredacted and the people attached need to be removed.

[–] Honytawk@feddit.nl 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I'd like it to convince everyone else that he is a vile man as well though.

[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Who would make their products? Who would buy their products? What the fuck do they think is going to happen if all the poor people are gone?

[–] Xella@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

Servants (slaves) don't count as poor people. Cull the poors unless they volunteer to be servants.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 9 points 6 days ago

By taxing the rich and putting that money into social care.

[–] blinfabian@feddit.nl 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] blinfabian@feddit.nl 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

thanks, i couldnt fix it idk why

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Because of the space, I think. The responder translated it to its ASCII value so the link parser was able to parse it.

[–] josephmbasile@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

More shit to FOIA

[–] Railcar8095@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Somebody has to make a website.

Where the quote from? Captain planet villain vs Epstein emails

[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Who is their friend shooting a feature?

Sounds like yet another pile of shite in the film industry that needs to get ousted.

[–] Honytawk@feddit.nl 3 points 6 days ago

Maybe they want to solve world poverty?

Probably not though.