I feel like I'm going to become the Joker.
Ehhhh, kinda a stretch. Microtransactions predate this 2013 letter. They weren't as ubiquitous as now.
But like, Farmville existed in, like, the late 2000s...
this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2026
91 points (98.9% liked)
Gaming
6908 readers
63 users here now
!gaming is a community for gaming noobs through gaming aficionados. Unlike !games, we don’t take ourselves quite as serious. Shitposts and memes are welcome.
Our Rules:
1. Keep it civil.
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only.
2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry.
I should not need to explain this one.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month.
Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.
Logo uses joystick by liftarn
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
It's all the horse armor's fault.
The Horse Armor is definitely an early form of microtransations, but it's not the first type. A lot of people think of it as the first "paid for dlc", but that's not quite right either. Because it didn't really add any new content, it just altered existing content. It was the first kind of paid "mod" of game. But even that's not quite accurate either. Because "Mods" include things that enhance gameplay, add/improve features, etc. What the horse armor really showed is that people would spend money for different "Skins". Horse armor was the first paid for "skin". Character skins, weapon skins, gun charms, etc etc.
But even given all that, the horse armor still isn't the start of microtransactions in games.
Crystals/EnergyShards/Feathers/etcetcetc. The price wall/gatekeep bullshit meant to restrict play unless you paid. Those are the first real "microtranscations". And for that you can thank casual games that predate the SmartPhone era. Like FarmVille.
FarmVille really fucked us over. I mean, if they wouldn't have I'm sure someone else would, but I still choose to blame them.
This sounds like it's talking about parenting, right? How to motivate kids to read?
Also this is someone forwarding epstein an email from bobby kotick without any input from epstein.
How is it that "microtransaction can be traced to epstein" when it doesn't mention microtransactions and epstein doesn't say anything?
Isn't this just some asshole telling Epstein what some other asshole (Bobby Kotick) told him?
And isn't he ripping on Kotick?