this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2026
118 points (94.7% liked)

THE POLICE PROBLEM

4490 readers
681 users here now

    The police problem is that police are policed by the police. Cops are accountable only to other cops, which is no accountability at all.

    99.9999% of police brutality, corruption, and misconduct is never investigated, never punished, never makes the news, so it's not on this page.

    When cops are caught breaking the law, they're investigated by other cops. Details are kept quiet, the officers' names are withheld from public knowledge, and what info is eventually released is only what police choose to release — often nothing at all.

    When police are fired — which is all too rare — they leave with 'law enforcement experience' and can easily find work in another police department nearby. It's called "Wandering Cops."

    When police testify under oath, they lie so frequently that cops themselves have a joking term for it: "testilying." Yet it's almost unheard of for police to be punished or prosecuted for perjury.

    Cops can and do get away with lawlessness, because cops protect other cops. If they don't, they aren't cops for long.

    The legal doctrine of "qualified immunity" renders police officers invulnerable to lawsuits for almost anything they do. In practice, getting past 'qualified immunity' is so unlikely, it makes headlines when it happens.

    All this is a path to a police state.

    In a free society, police must always be under serious and skeptical public oversight, with non-cops and non-cronies in charge, issuing genuine punishment when warranted.

    Police who break the law must be prosecuted like anyone else, promptly fired if guilty, and barred from ever working in law-enforcement again.

    That's the solution.

♦ ♦ ♦

Our definition of ‘cops’ is broad, and includes prison guards, probation officers, shitty DAs and judges, etc — anyone who has the authority to fuck over people’s lives, with minimal or no oversight.

♦ ♦ ♦

RULES

Real-life decorum is expected. Please don't say things only a child or a jackass would say in person.

If you're here to support the police, you're trolling. Please exercise your right to remain silent.

Saying ~~cops~~ ANYONE should be killed lowers the IQ in any conversation. They're about killing people; we're not.

Please don't dox or post calls for harassment, vigilantism, tar & feather attacks, etc.

Please also abide by the instance rules.

It you've been banned but don't know why, check the moderator's log. If you feel you didn't deserve it, hey, I'm new at this and maybe you're right. Send a cordial PM, for a second chance.

♦ ♦ ♦

ALLIES

!abolition@slrpnk.net

!acab@lemmygrad.ml

r/ACAB

r/BadCopNoDonut/

Randy Balko

The Civil Rights Lawyer

The Honest Courtesan

Identity Project

MirandaWarning.org

♦ ♦ ♦

INFO

A demonstrator's guide to understanding riot munitions

Adultification

Cops aren't supposed to be smart

Don't talk to the police.

Killings by law enforcement in Canada

Killings by law enforcement in the United Kingdom

Killings by law enforcement in the United States

Know your rights: Filming the police

Three words. 70 cases. The tragic history of 'I can’t breathe' (as of 2020)

Police aren't primarily about helping you or solving crimes.

Police lie under oath, a lot

Police spin: An object lesson in Copspeak

Police unions and arbitrators keep abusive cops on the street

Shielded from Justice: Police Brutality and Accountability in the United States

So you wanna be a cop?

When the police knock on your door

♦ ♦ ♦

ORGANIZATIONS

Black Lives Matter

Campaign Zero

Innocence Project

The Marshall Project

Movement Law Lab

NAACP

National Police Accountability Project

Say Their Names

Vera: Ending Mass Incarceration

 

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Apple will eventually notify the occupants of the vehicle that an unkonwn BLE marker is in their proximity for XX time, but, perhaps they won't find it or know about it. They are pretty fucking stupid.

top 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] fratermus@piefed.social 1 points 37 minutes ago

throw them at ICE vehicles

I suspect that would give ICE another excuse to "f33r for muh life!!!!!!!!!" and start blasting.

[–] schnokobaer@feddit.org 36 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Why use a device that is specifically designed not to track other people and has countermeasures built in to warn them..

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 8 points 20 hours ago

Because Apple's got millions of these overpriced widgets sitting in warehouses and this guerrilla marketing campaign might move a few more.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

It's a good way to stay reasonably anonymous. Either you have to have and pay for a SIM and the LTE module or take advantage of the apple tracking system.

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 5 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

It's a good way to stay reasonably anonymous

You think that Apple doesn't have a database that links the Airtag to a phone/Apple account?

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today -3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

It's cryptographically impossible. The purchase history is much more attack surface.

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

What are you talking about?

If your phone remembers your airtags, and your phone is linked to an account, then they have a record of that. None of that requires anything encrypted. We're not talking about tracking anything directly, it's simply pulling the record that your phone registered the airtag previously.

[–] Suburbanl3g3nd@lemmings.world 3 points 14 hours ago

Realistically, if someone is doing this seriously, they'll get a burner phone and account. So that wouldn't really matter because the trail will be cold/difficult to trace back

[–] mastod0n@lemmy.world 23 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Sounds like a solid way to endanger yourself. AirTags are registered to accounts whixh lead to people.

[–] Cyberflunk@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Is it against the law? Ur right tho, sock puppet time

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 14 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure it is against the law lol

[–] Suburbanl3g3nd@lemmings.world 6 points 14 hours ago

"Is placing GPS tracking devices on federal agents (never mind doing that to anyone) illegal?"

That's a thinker for sure.

[–] L7HM77@sh.itjust.works 1 points 13 hours ago

That question doesn't seem to matter these days...

[–] MurrayL@lemmy.world 21 points 22 hours ago (4 children)

‘Eventually’? I sometimes get notified about people with AirTags sitting near me on the same train.

There’s almost zero chance they don’t find these in an hour or less, and the precise tracking feature allows you to find exactly where they are.

Considering the tags alone cost about $30 each this would just be an enormous waste of money.

[–] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 12 points 21 hours ago

As the post title says,

It would be horrible to get these magnetic airtag holders, and throw them at ICE vehicles for tracking.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Its actually not hard to make a tracking bug with a decent range. The problem is that they still use rentals afaik.

[–] Lydia_K@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

So if the rentals are damaged in any way they would be in the hook to pay for the repairs?

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 7 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, our taxes are paying for repairs.

[–] Lydia_K@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Our taxes are already paying them, the question is does it come out of their budget and drain their funds?

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 5 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Their funds are as deep as the administration feels like they are. Probably up to and including armed robbery of citizens at gunpoint if things keep going. Think "nazis ripping fillings out" type of "we need to fund ICE"

[–] chocrates@piefed.world 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Probably if a bunch of rental cars kept getting totalled, rental companies would stop renting yo them.

[–] Junkers_Klunker@feddit.dk 2 points 12 hours ago

No, they’ll get a new car paid with taxpayer money.

[–] morphballganon@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

So airtags are useless for securing cars or other important items against theft?

Since the thieves will be notified about the airtag and thus know to look for and toss it?

[–] MurrayL@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

Not useless, but yes - they’re likely to be quickly found and discarded.

[–] Cyberflunk@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago

Shit, I didn't know it was that fast, my experience had been like 6 hours

[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 20 hours ago

If you can't afford an air tag, a sufficiently large rock will suffice.

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net 7 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

While less stealthy, water balloons filled with red paint would probably be more effective

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago (4 children)

Wouldn't the cars just be all red? One or two balloons on each side looks distinctive. A random splash of red on an otherwise dark car.

Hundreds of red paint balloons just looks like a shitty paint job.

The idea COULD work by the hundreds if everybody picked their own color. Then hundreds of balloons would just look like confetti colors on their car, and stand out.

[–] emeralddawn45@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I doubt they mean hundreds of balloons at one car, they probably meant a few balloons for each vehicle but hundreds of people carrying balloons and marking hundreds of cars.

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net 3 points 18 hours ago

This is what I meant

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net 2 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

As /u/emeralddawn45@lemmy.dbzer0.com said, I meant hundreds of people marking cars, not hundreds of balloons to mark one car.

It would immediately, visibly, publicly mark that something is up with the car. It would cause them repair bills, even with them renting out cars. And if it went on long enough, they'd probably be banned from renting cars from enough places to give them trouble. And if you hit the windshield, you can de facto disable the car which fucks them over.

[–] axexrx@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Put a bunch of sand in tbe paint balloons and aim for the windshield so they fuck up the wiper blades, and can't see.

[–] neatchee@piefed.social 4 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Please specify that this only works for parked vehicles. We don't need dead pedestrians from drivers suddenly losing visibility

[–] Sxan@piefed.zip -2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

No, it's far better if ICE gets þeir jollies by shooting þe pedestrians.

[–] chocrates@piefed.world 1 points 19 hours ago

It's pretty easy to tell repeated paint balloons instead of a professional clear coat

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 4 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Why not use literally any other tracker that does NOT notify the person you are tracking that they are being tracked?

[–] Cyberflunk@lemmy.world 0 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Name one that has the coverage of airtags, android, but they alert too, even on iphones

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 6 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Literally any actual GPS tracker has universal coverage without alerting anyone. You are using the wrong tool for this job.

[–] Cyberflunk@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

AGREED! lets brainstorm hak5 device? pi/zero w gps usb, repurposed cell battery, external wifi antennas, modified alwardriving software that scans for open wifi and auto portal captcha solver, a c2 device hosted in island where the devices send webhooks to a valkey message queue?

thoughts?

[–] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 4 points 21 hours ago

Imagine doing it with an tag that doesn't scream to other devices of the same company that it exist (AKA: they can't find it out).

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago

Silicon is quite brittle. These would probably be better made of silicone.

[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 2 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Are AirTags anonymous or can you use the serial number to track who owns or bought it?

[–] Cyberflunk@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

No, they aren't, you'd have to mask yourself

[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 1 points 15 hours ago

you'll probably also have to register them to be able to use the distributed tracking network. so you will even link second hand tags to the phone you're using.

[–] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 3 points 21 hours ago

Assume that the government can track anything with a MAC address or ID.