this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2026
5 points (100.0% liked)

Strategy Games

699 readers
2 users here now

Computer games with a strategic component; construction, expansion, armies, economic development. Discussion on all sub-genres (RTS, Grand Strategy, Economic Strategy) is welcome, but the focus is on generic strategy games and hybrid games that don't fit into the following communities:


Some other gaming communities across the Threadiverse:


Game specific communities across the Threadiverse:


Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Piefed.world Rules - https://legal.piefed.world/tos

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No spam, illegal content, or games with excessive, non-artistic NSFW content (e.g. hentai or porn games).

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent genres (e.g. RTS, TBS) are of course fine.


founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Imagine playing modern paradox games

[–] Agent_Karyo@piefed.world 1 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I used to be a big fan, not so much for their Grand Strategy games (I've played CK2, Victoria for about ~15 hours each and it didn't click), but because they worked with Colossal Order , the creators of Cities in Motion (upon which Cities: Skylines is based).

They really have become a European EA.

[–] NutinButNet@hilariouschaos.com 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It’s ironic considering they were there to replace EA for the city building SimCity series with Cities: Skylines when SimCity 2013 utterly shit the bed.

[–] Agent_Karyo@piefed.world 1 points 3 days ago

I believe SimCity 2013 was the last EA game I played. I even pre-ordered two copies (one for myself and one for my brother).

They basically committed fraud by knowingly misrepresenting the nature of their product. The early promo videos pitched a complex non-statistical, agent-based simulation. That was of course de facto discarded and the whole game was a dysfunctional attempt at making a "live service" style multiplayer game in genre that's in many way fundamentally a single player experience.

Paradox feels marginally better than EA these days.

[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 days ago

Yep...i fell for ck3. Buying that and for viki 3 because both were really hyped and i never played the predicesor. They dont get me with eu5 nore with all their recent DLCs

Imperator Rome was the first sign if we look back...just dropping something because it didnt make enought profit from the get go