this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2026
159 points (100.0% liked)

World News

2086 readers
868 users here now

Rules:
Be a decent person.
No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, zionism/nazism, and so on.

Other Great Communities:

Rules

Be excellent to each other

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 65 points 3 months ago (2 children)

i bet these ice clowns thought “theres foreign looking people in that building we can assault and deport” without having a clue on what an embassy even is

[–] ozymandias@sh.itjust.works 27 points 3 months ago

i wouldn’t bet against this

[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)

What’s a con-soo-lit? Some kind of restaurant? Food any good?

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

"The Consulate" is one of three bars-slash-video-gambling-halls in their shithole quasi-retirement town of 800 people with a 99.8% white population.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 months ago

No, no. I believe it's the name of an old, old, wooden ship used during the Civil War era...

[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 months ago

I knew I remembered it from somewheres

[–] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 11 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

If ICE went into the Embassy with aggressive intent, and an Embassy security guard pulled out a gun and took out the threat, what would this be considered?

Technically, ICE is acting in the capacity of a government agent.

I guess the same could be said if ICE crosses into Canada or Mexico (or Italy).

[–] Dadifer@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago

Embassies are considered the sovereign land of the respective nation. ICE has no jurisdiction or power in Ecuador. Killing an ICE agent with aggressive intent in the embassy would be considered a "diplomatic situation", but not against the law.

[–] Luminous5481@anarchist.nexus 7 points 3 months ago

Trump would throw a fit. Might even do something very rash. But legally it would be their right to use lethal force to protect their sovereign land.

And every other country would be wondering if their consulates were safe if he did anything. It would cost the US dearly, especially if nations we were allied with started pulling their embassies out.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Realistically Trump would threaten Ecuador and or sanction them for killing government employees. 

They’d only use it as an excuse to attack their leaders and try to install their own. 

[–] RedstoneValley@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 months ago

If the US were to to violate the Vienna Convention On Diplomatic Relations this would have extreme consequences for diplomatic relations to all other countries. Even the most backwards shit ass dictatorships honor this convention.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 1 points 3 months ago

"1000% TARRIFS!" Because he stupidly thinks tarrifs are a punishment.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago

We've already had your border baffoons enter Canada to fuck with us.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago (3 children)

They're a bunch of kids who failed every class in public school except gun maintenance 101.

They couldn't parse the sentence "Foreign embassies are sovereign territory", let alone be expected to possess that knowledge to begin with.

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

So LEGALLY, an embassy is not considered foreign soil. However, attempting to invade one is tantamount to a declaration of war.

Consulates, on the other hand, are not necessarily the same thing and may not enjoy the same level of protection. Your embassy performs the high-level diplomatic shit, but consulates are more for day-to-day stuff (visas, taxes, etc).

[–] riskable@programming.dev 2 points 3 months ago

If only we had Gun Maintenance 101 in public schools. Americans are issued "Baby's First Glock" at birth as part of the APGAR-USA-USA-USA! test and then... Nothing.

[–] OldChicoAle@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

There's like 4 words in that sentence they don't understand

The Enemy of All of Us.