this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2026
94 points (100.0% liked)

Linux Phones

2704 readers
50 users here now

The Discussion on Linux-based Phones.


Benefits:

  • Hardware freedom.
  • Perfect operating-system competition.
  • Full utilization of specs.
  • Phone lifespan raises to 10+ years.
  • Less e-waste.

Linux Mobile Distros:

  • Ubuntu Touch
  • Sailfish
  • FuriOS
  • Postmarket OS
  • Mobian
  • Pure OS
  • Plasma Mobile
  • LuneOS
  • openSUSE Mobile
  • Nemomobile
  • Droidian
  • Mobile NixOS
  • ExpidusOS
  • Maemo Leste
  • Manjaro Arm
  • Tizen
  • WebOS

Linux Mobile Hardware:

  • Fairphone 5
  • Volla Phone
  • PinePhone
  • FLX1
  • Librem 5

⚙️Contribute

🧼Go Clean From the Duopoly:

💻Related Communities:

📰News:

💬Messager:

⌚️Watch:


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

With the powerful off-the-shelf hardware available to us common hardware hobbyist folk, how hard can it be to make a smartphone from scratch? Hence V Electronics’s Spirit smartphone project, with the video from a few months ago introducing the project.

As noted on the hardware overview page, everything about the project uses off the shelf parts and modules, except for the Raspberry Pi Compute Module 5 (CM5) carrier board. The LCD is a 5.5″, 1280×720 capacitive one currently, but this can be replaced with a compatible one later on, same as the camera and the CM5 board, with the latter swappable with any other CM5 or drop-in compatible solution.

The star of the show and the thing that puts the ‘phone’ in ‘smartphone’ is the Quectel EG25-GL LTE (4G) and GPS module which is also used in the still-not-very-open PinePhone. Although the design of the carrier board and the 3D printable enclosure are still somewhat in flux, the recent meeting notes show constant progress, raising the possibility that with perhaps some community effort this truly open hardware smartphone will become a reality.

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Samskara@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 week ago

The hard part of a cell phone is the baseband firmware that enables communication over mobile networks.

[–] certified_expert@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 18 points 1 week ago

No, but I'd still support this project because the manufacturers need to be shown there's a significant audience for something more open than the current duopoly

[–] Jumuta@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

what's the alternative? you make a phone with riscv that has even less software support?

[–] certified_expert@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

This comment is inaccurate. The only thing you need to port is the compiler. The rest just follows.

[–] Jumuta@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

how about things like ffmpeg? lots of that stuff is written in assembly

[–] certified_expert@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Point taken

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Well, yes. It's not like this will be anyone's daily driver anyway. Why not commit to openness?

[–] erebion@news.erebion.eu 3 points 1 week ago

To quote Obama: Better is good

[–] UnpledgedCatnapTipper@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ease of access and familiarity for the large number of Raspberry Pi users is a good reason. Is there a popular, readily available RISC single board computer that has large community adoption? I'm not aware of one, but if there is, I'd like to know about it!

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 2 points 1 week ago

I get it, but it's a chicken and egg situation. The could be the project to create a RISC-V base for cell phones. And then it grows from there.