this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2026
57 points (98.3% liked)

Fuck Cars

14419 readers
462 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This is really a stupid and anti-bicycle law, hopefully others won't follow.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Meanwhile, like every other US state New Jersey has made absolutely zero effort to include these inevitable vehicles in any road or transportation planning whatsoever, guaranteeing that every time one is used it's either getting in the way of a driver or bringing a motor into an otherwise non-motorized space. Thereby generating legislation that ensures the "maximum pain" period of increasing adopting with zero infrastructure support lasts as long as possible.

[–] evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, that's the main problem. They are obviously here, and people obviously want to use them, so they will. Pretending like they dont exist only makes things suck for everyone.

We need clear policy and enforcement.

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 1 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Specifically, that clear policy needs to include funding and planning for micromobility infrastructure. I want to emphasize, the real important missing piece here is infrastructure.

This is something even the bike-friendly European nations seem to be struggling with at the moment.

[–] Ooops@feddit.org 14 points 1 day ago

And shown on the picture is yet another pseudo electric motorcycle abomination of a fat bike instead of an actual average ebike to make the argument look sane.

[–] merde@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] Luffy879@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago

Fatbikes and others are a joke. They are the humvee of the bikes. If you wanted to bike, go get a bike for 50€. If you want to use a motorcycle, get an old motorcycle. Those abominations are only there to count as bicycles so those fucks can use biking infra

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

As your link explains the proposal is just to ban them from parks and other low-speed pedestrian areas. Amsterdam hasn't banned cars, they're not about to ban ebikes.

[–] smeg@infosec.pub 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The only reason this would ever be necessary is because ebikes (and bikes) have to interact with cars in dangerous spaces. Instead of punishing people who are reducing traffic by cycling, they should be building safer spaces to do so.

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No. There really are these abominations like in the picture. They are unsafe and because they have pedals, they seemingly avoid enforcement of current laws.

[–] smeg@infosec.pub 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Amsterdam is banning fat tire ebikes (that are really just low profile electric motorcycles). If there's 1 thing that breaks the rules, ban it. I expect the rest of the Netherlands to follow suit because everyone here is complaining about them.

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 day ago

Amsterdam is not doing that. Amsterdam is currently considering banning ebikes from certain parks and pedestrian areas, specifically.

[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 day ago

No, it's because humans are inherently selfish and stupid beings that will always endanger others to avoid inconvenience and an "ebike" like the one in the picture is just a motorcycle with a licence to ignore traffic laws.

[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

Literally none of this would be necessary if the US didn't treat its speed limits like a loose suggestion.