this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2026
7 points (100.0% liked)

Friendly Carnivore

87 readers
18 users here now

Carnivore

The ultimate, zero carb, elimination diet

Meat Heals.

We are focused on health and lifestyle while trying to eat zero carb bioavailable foods.

Keep being AWESOME

We welcome engaged, polite, and logical debates and questions of any type


Purpose

Rules

  1. Be nice
  2. Stay on topic
  3. Don't farm rage
  4. Be respectful of other diets, choices, lifestyles!!!!
  5. No Blanket down voting - If you only come to this community to downvote its the wrong community for you
  6. No LLM generated posts . Don't represent machine output as your own, and don't use machines to burn human response time.

Other terms: LCHF Carnivore, Keto Carnivore, Ketogenic Carnivore, Low Carb Carnivore, Zero Carb Carnivore, Animal Based Diet, Animal Sourced Foods


Meta

Carnivore Resource List

If you need to block this community and the UI won't let you, go to settings -> blocks you can add it.

[Meta] Moderation Policy for Niche Communities

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Saturated fat is back in the headlines, and so is the confusion.

The new Dietary Guidelines for Americans just dropped, and while there’s clear progress (more support for animal-based protein, low-carb options, and reduced sugar), they’ve kept the 10% cap on saturated fat. But does the science still support that limit, and does it make sense with the rest of the recommendations?

In this episode, Dr. Bret Scher breaks down the real story on saturated fat: where the guidelines get it right, where they fall short, and why context is everything when it comes to fat, food, and metabolic health.

summerizer

  • Why this topic is back
    • The new Dietary Guidelines for Americans keep a 10% cap on saturated fat.
    • The same guidelines push more protein, fewer grains and sugars, and a low-carb option for metabolic disease.
    • They also list butter and tallow as cooking fats, which can look inconsistent with the cap.
  • My bottom line upfront
    • Saturated fat from minimally processed whole foods, in a lower-sugar / lower-refined-carb diet, is a different exposure than saturated fat in a standard American diet.
    • The food source and the surrounding diet matter more than a single saturated-fat number.
  • Evidence bucket 1: long-term diet surveys
    • These studies use self-reported diets and track heart disease over time.
    • Results are weak and inconsistent: some link higher saturated fat to higher risk, others do not.
    • Effect sizes are small (hazard ratios ~1.1–1.4), compared with smoking and cancer (~15–20).
    • Big problems: confounding (smoking, exercise, income, access to care), “healthy user” behavior, and recall/FFQ error.
    • They also mix food sources (steak and cheese get lumped with pizza, pastries, and ice cream).
    • Useful for hypothesis generation; not strong for cause-and-effect.
  • Evidence bucket 2: controlled feeding and mechanisms
    • These studies often show saturated fat can raise LDL cholesterol in many people.
    • A key mechanism: saturated fat can lower liver LDL-receptor activity.
    • Limits: LDL is a risk marker, not a heart-attack outcome.
    • Many studies miss the broader risk picture: insulin resistance, triglycerides, HDL, inflammation.
    • Practical move: measure your own labs on the diet you actually eat, including ApoB if available.
  • Evidence bucket 3: randomized trials that lower saturated fat
    • People are assigned to reduce saturated fat or not, often swapping it for carbs or polyunsaturated fats (PUFAs).
    • Typical pattern: modest LDL lowering, little or no change in all-cause mortality, mixed/neutral heart attack and stroke results.
    • A major limit is duration: often ~5 years, which can be short for coronary disease outcomes.
    • Substitution matters: saturated fat → carbs is neutral or worse for heart attack risk in some trial sets.
    • Saturated fat → PUFA has a small benefit signal, but the supporting trial set has high bias risk.
  • Evidence bucket 4: studies that separate saturated fat by food source
    • When saturated fat is split by source, whole-food sources (dairy, unprocessed meats, chocolate) are often neutral, sometimes favorable.
    • Many dairy findings show a small signal toward fewer cardiovascular events.
    • Processed foods that combine saturated fat + refined carbs show harm more often.
  • Evidence bucket 5: low-carb and ketogenic trials
    • These are interventions where carbs drop and saturated-fat intake often rises.
    • The saturated fat shifts from processed fat+carb foods toward whole-food fat sources.
    • Typical results: lower triglycerides, higher HDL, better insulin sensitivity.
    • Often: no rise, or even reductions, in ApoB and LDL particle counts; broader risk markers improve.
    • A small subset shows large LDL rises; long-term outcome meaning is unclear.
    • Keto-CTA comments: an early plaque-progression result tied to one analysis did not match three other analyses, which showed slower progression or regression; more results are expected.
  • Comment responses and takeaways
    • Allowing saturated-fat foods is not permission for a standard American diet; it fits a whole-food pattern where LDL does not automatically rise.
    • “Plant-only reversal” talking point: Ornish-style reversal programs bundle diet with smoking cessation, exercise, stress management, social support, and medical therapy, so diet alone is not isolated.
    • “Blue zones low saturated fat” pushback: Mediterranean island patterns include goat milk, lamb, pork, and cheese, not a saturated-fat–free diet.
    • Individual testing is endorsed: labs plus carotid imaging, coronary calcium scoring, or coronary CT angiography can guide personal nutrition choices.
  • Close
    • Stop treating saturated fat as one thing.
    • Track food source, processing, carb context, metabolic health, and measured biomarkers.

References

no comments (yet)
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here