this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2026
-2 points (37.5% liked)

Friendly Carnivore

87 readers
18 users here now

Carnivore

The ultimate, zero carb, elimination diet

Meat Heals.

We are focused on health and lifestyle while trying to eat zero carb bioavailable foods.

Keep being AWESOME

We welcome engaged, polite, and logical debates and questions of any type


Purpose

Rules

  1. Be nice
  2. Stay on topic
  3. Don't farm rage
  4. Be respectful of other diets, choices, lifestyles!!!!
  5. No Blanket down voting - If you only come to this community to downvote its the wrong community for you
  6. No LLM generated posts . Don't represent machine output as your own, and don't use machines to burn human response time.

Other terms: LCHF Carnivore, Keto Carnivore, Ketogenic Carnivore, Low Carb Carnivore, Zero Carb Carnivore, Animal Based Diet, Animal Sourced Foods


Meta

Carnivore Resource List

If you need to block this community and the UI won't let you, go to settings -> blocks you can add it.

[Meta] Moderation Policy for Niche Communities

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Cancer can only metabolise glucose

Carbohydrates of all types turn into glucose.

Humans can live without eating carbohydrates.

Going strict zero carb (carnivore) will stop feeding the cancer extra fuel, reducing the growth rate. For some people this is enough so their own bodies can get ahead of the cancer.

This makes carnivore a great ADJUNCT to a cancer treatment plan. By itself carnivore will not cure cancer.

Without medical intervention the body will still make glucose, which cancer can use. This production is at a much lower rate then eating carbs. There is a human trial testing cancer protocol that presses of zero carb eating with pulses of drugs that stop the bodies glucose production. The studies that use this focus on glioblastomas in the brain and show very promising results (in humans, not mice)

Tldr: carnivore doesn't cure cancer, but it doesn't enable cancer either, it couldn't hurt to go zero carbohydrate while fighting cancer.


a shower thought, since I've been talking to my friends about cancer seemingly over and over. Every body knows somebody fighting cancer

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] xep@discuss.online 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

There is a lot of well-deserved skepticism out there when it comes to the effects of diet on cancer outcomes, and understandably this post has been heavily downvoted. You may be interested in reading some recent studies regarding the effectiveness of ketogenic diets on the outcomes of cancer patients:

Ketogenic diet and chemotherapy combine to disrupt pancreatic cancer metabolism and growth

What We Have Learned About Combining a Ketogenic Diet and Chemoimmunotherapy: a Case Report and Review of Literature

Impact of ketogenic diets on cancer patient outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

[–] xep@discuss.online 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

There is an interesting theory that cancer is related to the electrical potential of the cell. To quote the paper Gerald Pollack has written on the theory:

How might these features of electrical potential relate to the issue of cancer?

While the magnitude of the stable electrical potential may vary among different cells, typically it lies in the range of -50 mV to -100 mV. When we were carrying out electrophysiological measurements during early career, we knew that when the electrical potential was of smaller magnitude, the cell might be struggling to stay alive and it was time to switch to specimens with more normal electrical potentials. Others knew the same. That experience squares with the idea of the electrical potential as a critical feature of cell function. For the cell to operate properly, it must maintain a robust negative electrical potential.

Thus, a striking clue comes from the electrical potential of cancer cells. That potential magnitude is consistently small. Compared to the electrical potential of most normal cells, cancer cells exhibit potentials on the order of only 10 - 15 mV. That low electrical potential is seen over diverse cancer-cell types [31-35]. It is a characteristic feature.

There is also some evidence for deuterium-depleted water being related to cancer pathology. Water seems to play a part in cancer. It's important to note that these are both just theories, but they are also both consistent with the Warburg hypothesis.

Hopefully we get a better view into the disease state sooner than later. A holistic approach may be far better than the reductionist way of seeing cancer as a genetic condition.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It is a appealing theory, but what makes this hard for me to get behind is how I can experience a effect.

Keto I can see and measure

Carnivore I can see and measure

This electrical charge of cells and the interaction with heavy water feels interesting on a academic level, but nothing I can experiment and see.

I'm onboard with getting people into the context they evolved for, so in that vein grounding makes perfect sense.

[–] xep@discuss.online 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Agreed.

I'm not sure how we can experiment with the various kinds of water mentioned in this body of research at all. We can do the best we can with our current understanding by providing our body with sufficient radiant energy from exposure to sunlight, eating food with low deuterium (primarily animal sources), and grounding. However I've found it impossibly difficult to quantify, and so when asked about it I can only say that there's no harm in trying.

[–] msokiovt@lemmy.today -4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Cancer doesn't exist as we understand it. All cancer is, to the people who actually suffered through it, is just a nasty parasite problem that can be fixed with something like fenbendozole and/or ivermectin when protocols on how to do it are researched.

That's just how I see it. Coffee and green tea also have great health benefits, and can help with those issues too.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

How would you define the mechanisms of this parasite?

My mode of cancer fits the Warburg hypothesis, that it's principally a disorder of the mitochondria. I.e. cancer as a metabolic disease https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-7075-7-7

For the drugs you mention, what is their mechanism of action. How do they interact with your model of this parasite?

[–] msokiovt@lemmy.today -1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

In terms of metabolic diseases, I do understand chronically fermenting cells, though I partially think about polyps from parasites, as most diseases come from parasites (terrain theory, however, postulates that if the terrain is bad, then health tends to go down with it).

Fenbendozole and ivermectin are anti-parasitic drugs (hence, why they were banned for some amount of time) from what I'm aware of..

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 3 points 5 days ago

I'm still not seeing how cancer is a parasite