At this stage non-violence is compliance.
That child needed people out there with guns fighting for them to stop them getting sent to the camps. Bullies like this back down quickly when people genuinely stand up to them.
Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.
If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.
Rules
Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.
No memes/pics of text
Post news related to the United States.
At this stage non-violence is compliance.
That child needed people out there with guns fighting for them to stop them getting sent to the camps. Bullies like this back down quickly when people genuinely stand up to them.
just saying, destruction of property is still in alignment with nonviolent protests.
things like slashing tires, paint bombing vehicles, destruction of roads or blocking roads with debris is all considered nonviolent protest.
get creative. go to your local hardware store (not home depot because they use flock cameras), and buy things that could be used to achieve the goals of slowing or stopping their goals.
Destruction of property is violence, and it’s based as fuck.
destruction of property is not violence, that's just what the police state wants you to believe. violence is an act perpetrated against another individual.
property is just that. you can't rape property, you can't murder property. the act itself is violent, but the action of destruction of property is nonviolent due to the lack of an individual.
they'll still charge you with violence, but that's just the police state doing whatever it does.
funny though, the police state allows the violent abduction and murder of its citizens without any ramifications.
Who gives a fuck about the police, violence is the use of force to destroy or harm. There is nothing inherently wrong with violence, what matters is the intent and target. Violence against the state and private property is a noble and just cause and I fully support violence in that regard.
It's cold in Minnesota, but Molotovs will keep ICE agents warm for the rest of their lives.
"This is a crossing point. The Nazis decided to arrest a good jew, that didn't commit any crime and wasn't here illegally"
So you see Trump hunting down minorities, actively trying to kill and/or torture them, but the line is only crossed when it's the "good ones"?
I really hate that moronic shit, you're basically implying that it wasn't a problem when the ones being hunted down were ones without papers, and fuck you for that. If the " line" that determines whether something is immoral or not for you is a fucking piece of paper, then fuck you.
This attorney is basically making it sound like the nazis are not doing anything wrong as long as they have an administrative justification.
it's not about inaction, it's about clear evidence that they're lying.
you know they are and I know they are, but do they know they are? it can be easily argued that the right clearly doesn't care about morality or lies, but the undecided citizen not so much.
people are dumb thickheaded ignorant fools and it's important to force their attention to the blatant corruption and lies they insist on ignoring out of convenience.