Really normal and healthy behavior from a perfectly functional company.
this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2026
51 points (94.7% liked)
PC Gaming
14567 readers
552 users here now
For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki
Rules:
- Be Respectful.
- No Spam or Porn.
- No Advertising.
- No Memes.
- No Tech Support.
- No questions about buying/building computers.
- No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
- No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
- No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
- Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
ubishit never changed
they were always excremental reek
I cannot believe one of these isn't beyond good and evil 2. Imagine how soul crushing it would be for the game you are working on to be deemed more trouble than bge2.
Ubisoft cancelling the literal one game I might have bought from them. OK.
PoP really can't catch a break from these clowns
The Lost Crown was pretty good though.
It was great, so they dissolved the studio and moved all the incredible talent who worked on it to the money-making franchises
Didn't do it for me, sadly.
Ubisoft did the world a favor.
I wish fans wouldn't have reacted this negative in the first reveal of the Remake. I said it before, this will probably lead into cancelling the project and I was right. Even if the graphics didn't look fantastical good, I would rather played that version over not playing it. I never played Sands of Time and was waiting for this Remake. I'm a bit sad this is the outcome, but was expected (at least by me)...
Highly doubt its about user reception, rather that its more about stonks.
And what do you think caused the stonks? The user reception was so bad that they had to pull it back and rework it. It is all about user reception.
Mmm stonks is more about shareholders demanding faster returns. This isnt a cut and dry supply and demand thing (markets havent been supply and demand since the stock market started), its shareholder feelings and ai investment shit.
Would love for any of it to have a shred of logic in it, but if games were for gamers and not stockholders IaP wouldn't exist etc
That’s gamers for ya. If it’s any consolation, it seems gamers had nothing to do with its troubled development
I'm not talking about the development, but specifically the reception of the first trailer.
Yes I know