this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2026
56 points (96.7% liked)

BuyFromEU

5209 readers
370 users here now

Welcome to BuyFromEU - A community dedicated to supporting European-made goods and services!

Feel free to post, comment and vote, be excellent to each other and follow the rules.

We also invite you to subscribe to:

Logo generated with mistral le chat Banner by Christian Lue on unsplash.com

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
 

The Bilanz article that cybernews refers to is quite insightful. Here is a Deepl translation:

W Social wants to compete with Twitter

A new social network aims to make Europe more independent. In the leading role: Anna Zeiter from Zurich.

Marc Kowalsky, Bilanz, 19 January 2026

For eleven and a half years, she was a key figure at eBay, responsible for all non-American business and, as Chief Privacy Officer, also responsible for data protection worldwide at the internet auction house. Now Anna Zeiter (46), a resident of Zurich, is taking a career step that could have geopolitical consequences: Zeiter is to build a European response to X, formerly Twitter. This is another step in the efforts to free Europe, at least to some extent, from its technological dependence on the US. Because if the conflict over Greenland escalates, Elon Musk will flood X with US propaganda. The new network is called W Social. ‘The W stands for “We” and the big questions in investigative journalism: Who, how, what, when, where and why?’ says Zeiter. And in English, the first V that makes up the W stands for Values, the second for Verified. The fact that W comes before X in the alphabet is certainly also welcome.

Zeiter describes the new network as a ‘better version of Twitter’: ‘Positive, respectful communication should be encouraged.’ Users must identify themselves as human beings. This prevents fake accounts and excludes bots that serve as multipliers of false reports or propaganda. W Social also wants to address the filter bubble problem: if desired, a certain number of posts for each user can come specifically from a different opinion bubble. All data is hosted decentrally in Europe by European companies. And, of course, W Social is subject to strict EU data protection laws. The beta version is scheduled to go live in February at the latest, and W plans to open up to the general public at the end of the year.

Right from the start, W has had prominent supporters: its advisory board includes former German Vice-Chancellor and Swiss citizen Philipp Rösler, Sandrine Dixson-Declève, Chair of the Club of Rome, Cristina Caffara, Chair of EuroStack, the association of the 300 most important tech CEOs, and two former Swedish ministers. ‘If the political establishment in Brussels posts on W instead of X, we will have already achieved a great deal,’ says Zeiter. ‘And with EuroStack, we will bring the tech world on board.’ The initial funding comes mainly from Swedish tech investors, including Ingmar Rentzhog, CEO and founder of ‘We don't have Time,’ a climate policy media and activism platform based in Stockholm. W plans to conduct a larger financing round later this year.

W will legally be a subsidiary of ‘We don't have Time’ and thus also based in Sweden, but the team is spread across Europe: Chief Commercial Officer Johan Sundstrand, a successful serial entrepreneur, is based in London, the tech team is in Ukraine, and offices in Berlin and Paris are planned. Zeiter herself will remain in Zurich. After all, the German-born entrepreneur has already passed the Swiss naturalisation test. Now she is just waiting for the green light from the federal authorities.

top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

The new platform, W, will require identification and photo validation to ensure that its users are both humans and who they claim to be, Danish news media outlet Politiken.dk reports.

Fuck that.

[–] GenosseFlosse@feddit.org 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

I actually think that this might be a good idea to keep bot networks of the platform, as long as this info is not public.

Nothing prevents trolls from automatically creating 100000 new accounts, have them all follow 1 account and then just like and share their posts for visibility on either twitter or Facebook, to tell boomers that billionaires are great people. Neither Facebook nor twitter will block those fake accounts as long as they bring in ad money, or their goals don't go against their owners interest.

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 1 points 3 minutes ago

"Give me 10.000 random images of diverse people's faces and matching IDs."

[–] TanteRegenbogen@feddit.org 57 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

Why? We already got Mastodon as a European alternative.

[–] Aequitas@feddit.org 3 points 5 hours ago

Mastodon is often mentioned as an alternative, but it has its own problems. In my opinion, the biggest one is that there is no way to sort your feed like you can on Lemmy. A chronological timeline will always lead to quantity being prioritized over quality. That's why newer users in particular only see boring stuff. If you bring this up, you're guaranteed to get some Madison fan saying that Mastodon doesn't want to be like Twitter, and especially doesn't want to have an algorithmic feed. But then it's not and cannot be an alternative, is it.

[–] hanke@feddit.nu 46 points 12 hours ago

Yeah, but Mastodon can't be controlled by a singular entity.

For me and you, that is a feature. For them, that is a flaw.

[–] copacetic@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

And "Mastodon" is not a good name. The term "Fediverse" is better but inevitably leads to confusion about decentralization.

I believe the Mastodon instance should strengthen their individual branding instead. Don't advertise "Mastodon" but advertise "feddit.org" instead.

[–] mrmaplebar@fedia.io 11 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

While I agree with the second part of what you're saying, it's also worth noting that no social media platform in history has had a good name. Like, MySpace? Facebook? X? TikTok?

[–] baguette@piefed.social 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

no social media platform in history has had a good name

I think Twitter and 'tweeting' actually is pretty clever naming. And to be honest, Facebook is a pretty understandable name too, if you look at where the name comes from and what it once was.

[–] cabbage@piefed.social 9 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Not to mention W, a single letter that nevertheless takes ages to pronounce in most languages.

[–] porcoesphino@mander.xyz 4 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

And is a pain for searching online. It's fine if you want the website, not great if you're looking for recent news

[–] mech@feddit.org 2 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

"takes ages to pronounce in most languages"

Which ones, other than English?

[–] Attacker94@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

In order to avoid confusion from ambiguity in Spanish, calling it doble uve ['do.ble.'u.ße] or something similarly long is required.

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 3 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

If I remember correctly, in French it's "double v" (doo-ble veh), so about the same as "double u". Japanese would get the name from English and twist it into "daburuyuu". (I don't know about "most" languages though)

[–] jlow@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 8 hours ago

🤦‍♀️

[–] JensSpahnpasta@feddit.org 21 points 12 hours ago

its advisory board includes former German Vice-Chancellor and Swiss citizen Philipp Rösler

Yeah, my interest totally evaporated. Rösler really has no good track record as a politican and his party was so unpopular that it went from being in the government to being voted out of the Bundestag. Interesting to see him pop up there, but I will stay with Lemmy/Mastodon

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 13 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

The best names are those you have to laboriously explain. /s

[–] vdbm@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

In Italian (where the letter "w" doesn't exist) it could work: vuvu 😆

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 2 points 10 hours ago

In German, it just sounds like a confused "whuh?"

[–] Hubi@feddit.org 38 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Right from the start, W has had prominent supporters: its advisory board includes former German Vice-Chancellor and Swiss citizen Philipp Rösler, [...]

Oof. sounds more like an "L" instead of "W".

[–] vdbm@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago

Cristina Caffarra (two "r"'s) is someone to explore though. See my Lemmy post about her.

[–] SrMono@feddit.org 31 points 13 hours ago

My positive respectful communication takes place at Mastodon 🤷‍♂️

[–] Una@europe.pub 14 points 13 hours ago

I mean, W is even worse name than X and there is Mastodon. Easier to advertise that. You could even make each country to have its own instance idk, mastodon feels like much easier approach than creating new platform from scratch.

The thing with X is it at least has cool sound to it, kinda edgy maybe, but does sound cooler but W just doesn't sound much authentic.

[–] FarraigePlaisteach@lemmy.world 15 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Sounds similar to https://www.trustcafe.io/en/About - at least the intentions. It’s a pity a new company is needed rather than supporting existing projects like Mastodon/PieFed etc. If it reduces the spread of oligarchs disinformation then it will be worth it IMO.

[–] cabbage@piefed.social 7 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

It would have been a pity had it been needed - thankfully it is not. This project either needs to connect to ActivityPub, or it's just a huge waste of time. I suspect the latter.

[–] FarraigePlaisteach@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

Yeah, I think investing in an existing, federated FOSS instance is what’s needed. Not this.

[–] thesdev@feddit.org 10 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

The new platform, W, will require identification and photo validation to ensure that its users are both humans and who they claim to be.

Anonymity on the web is at risk on multiple fronts (age verification mandates and discussions around banning VPNs come to mind) so this is probably not a good thing, but I can see the value in such a social network as long it's complementary to the anonymous platforms we have today. Perhaps the closest thing to it we have today is LinkedIn.

[–] MSBBritain@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

Absolutely, I don't think having non anonymous areas of the internet is necessarily an issue, so long as we also (can) provide plenty of non anonymous areas as well.

Anonymity has its downsides, and transparency has its advantages too, not just for the establishment.

It's just important to keep fighting for and protecting the anonymous bits in parallel.

[–] mrmaplebar@fedia.io 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

If they were serious about this, they'd join the Fediverse.

[–] vdbm@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

We simply don't know that. I can't find a website yet, so it is too early to make statements about their use of ActivityPub.

[–] madde@feddit.org 3 points 12 hours ago

Contrarian opinion here but I'm all for I'd verification in a social network and things. All other platforms like X, Facebook,... have gone downhill with bots and paid foreign actors. The same will happen to mastodon, lemmy, bluesky,... as well when they get bigger.

A hard to swallow pill but either we go down this way or we'll continue to open Putin, Trump,... the back door to our democracy. Let's hope it succeeds.