this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2026
28 points (93.8% liked)

No Stupid Questions

45438 readers
619 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I think the answer is - because they're lazy and want you to do their dirty work for them. I quite frankly, am not going to call the police over noise complaints because I think management should do something about that. Police should only be called when violence or tenants who get aggressive.

Not because of noise, I just think it's management dumping responsibility onto you when they're the ones with the power to evict people.

top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago

Laziness, but if your landlord is failing to provide you with quiet enjoyment of your home, in many jurisdictions that's a breach of your tenancy agreement, speak to your local tenant union.

Not sure why landlord simps are out here defending them

[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 14 hours ago

In my area they would get fined as a nusiance property and the fines involved are not cheap.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 5 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Not sure where you live, but that hasn't been my experience at all.

There could be regional variations based on things like tenant laws, local law enforcement policies, and even local culture.

[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 8 points 23 hours ago

Because they want the cash and not the responsibility of having as many tenants crammed together as possible.

[–] webkitten@piefed.social 5 points 1 day ago

Depends on what type of incident; if it's something like noise in the hall or smoking, my apartment management handles it and lets people know (assuming it's warning territory).

I'd imagine for anything else, it's a matter of not wanting to endanger people through escalation of non authority figures. I think you would have to have just cause to evict people, so having an official investigation would be imperitive.

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because noise limits exist and police have the power to enforce them.

Building manglement don't. The best they can do is say keep it down.

[–] RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Your landlord has the responsibility to ensure you get quiet enjoyment of the home you live it (by hiring building management they're delegating that responsible), it's up to them to sort out noise issues, it's on the landlord to sort by:

  • Installing noise dampening " Giving other tenants warnings (if it's something in their contract)
  • Contacting the police
  • Some other way

Ultimately OPs problem isn't other tenants, it's the noise.

Defaulting to involving cops, waste police time and endangers everyone involved.

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Your landlord has the responsibility to ensure you get quiet enjoyment of the home you live it

In what part of the world? OP doesn't say where they are from but it would be unreasonable for a landlord to provide that as there are too many things outside their control like other noise sources from beyond the building.

[–] fyrilsol@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 17 hours ago

What world do you live in, where nobody is entitled to quietness and peace? Of course there are things that can't be dealt with. You can't go outside and tell the carpet cleaning company that their equipment is too loud to stop it. That is what it is. You can't report an idiot with loud music from their car who happens to pass by.

But the problem lies when you're able to hear stupid children of a tenant through the walls directly from yours for nearly all hours of the day. When you have to actually evacuate what was once your bedroom to pile nearly everything into one living room, so now you're paying for only a third of the apartment (I pay close to $900 by the way). All because there's a couple who occasionally likes to argue around 1 in the morning and a rambling old seemingly drunk asshole rambling about shit all throughout the night at the same period of the morning.

If you're paying a landlord $900 a month, close to because RUB charges are involved (base is actually 795) and the lease agreement explicitly goes into a part of the lease agreement. Here, I've even taken a snippet from bullet point 9:

"No noise or disturbance allowed: Lessee, Lessee’s guests, occupants and invitees shall not become intoxicated, disorderly, harass or solicit residents, their guests or others, create or cause any odors or create or permit any unnecessary, unreasonable or improper noise or disturbance in or about the Premises or the building of which the Premises are a part, including and not by way of limitation, the operation of a stereo, radio or television set or playing of a musical instrument or singing in a manner or at times which might be objectionable to other tenants."

The fact that it explicitly says 'No noise' and goes a little more into it, implies my problem. Considering how much of that goes on and calling the police is my management's source of resolving things, they should be hiring an on-site residential officer or something because it'd be almost 24/7 with the rate the police would have to be called.

If your landlord is going to tell you to your face that you're entitled to your peace, they should be the ones doing anything possible to ensure your apartment is as peaceful as possible with problems they can actually deal with.

[–] RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world -1 points 21 hours ago

In what part of the world?

Anywhere where housing law is derived from English law, so pretty much anywhere that's English speaking.

it would be unreasonable for a landlord to provide that

For 1/2 my paycheck, dealing with noise complaints is pretty reasonable.

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 0 points 23 hours ago

Wait, so you think the building manager is being lazy by dumping the work on you to contact the people who can solve YOUR problem?

[–] deafboy@lemmy.world 0 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Another day at No Stupid Questions, another bait account.

[–] fyrilsol@kbin.melroy.org 2 points 17 hours ago

Another day of someone who thinks they know everything by their armchair.

[–] MyBrainHurts@piefed.ca -4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

What do you expect a building manager to do and why do you think boise complaints are their responsibility?

[–] fyrilsol@kbin.melroy.org 5 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Um, to do something?

Because I'm paying them fucking rent money and shit for a spot? Duh!

[–] MyBrainHurts@piefed.ca 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

To be slightly more polite, as this seems like one of your first places... You absolutely want to keep a neutral third party involved.

In my building, some of us are paying half or a third what new tenants do, the manager has a clear financial incentive to remove as many old timers as possible (and has tried her best.) If the norm was that building managers patrol for noise etc, you could much more easily get into a "he said/she said" with someone who has the means and motivation to remove you. Having the norm be police means that the complaint has to be somewhat valid, not just "enough that the building manager can increase their income stream."

[–] chloroken@lemmy.ml 1 points 14 hours ago

Landlord shit.

[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

While the details depend on the jurisdiction, in most of the saner places landlords can't evict over something like noise. Your anger is misplaced.

Have you tried being an adult and camly talking to your neighbour? Let them know what you hear, how its impacting you and some respectful suggestions on how things can be made better.

Also what kind of noise are we talking about and when? Life makes noise, and you chose to live in an appt with thin walls. Some noise is to be expected.

[–] MyBrainHurts@piefed.ca 1 points 1 day ago

Building manager isn't your parents. If you have a problem with the building, that's their issue, if you have a problem with your neighbour, you're expected to deal with it like any other adult; talk to the person, if that doesn't work, police.

[–] RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)
  • Installing noise dampening
  • Giving other tenants warnings (if it’s something in their contract)
  • Contacting the police
  • Some other way

Ultimately OPs problem isn’t other tenants, it’s the noise.

[–] MyBrainHurts@piefed.ca 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Wow, that's uhhhh, an interesting take. If one tenant is too noisy, you want the building manager to install noise dampening somethings? And who determines if it's too noisy, the landlord who'd have to pay for the renovations?

[–] RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

That's the law in pretty much anywhere that derived their tenancy agreements from English law.

Sadly it is not common practice anywhere as your landlord violating your lease in such a way, it is difficult to get anything done about it, because ultimately you still need somewhere to live and getting out of your contract isn't a win, in the way that your landlord getting out of his and rendering you homeless if you don't agree to his terms is.

I can’t even imagine how that would scale in a modern apartment.

You can't imagine, the guy taking 1/2 your paycheck having to actually earn that money?

[–] MyBrainHurts@piefed.ca 1 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

That’s the law in pretty much anywhere that derived their tenancy agreements from English law.

Please feel free to share an example, because this seems like absolute nonsense.

[–] RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

https://www.guildofletting.com/blog/the-implied-covenant-for-quiet-enjoymentnbspand-how-it-impacts-tenancies

The landlord’s duty to adhere to quiet enjoyment means the landlord must:-

  • Ensure the tenant’s actual possession of the property is not interfered with by the landlord or the landlord’s agent
  • Prevent any interference with the tenant’s enjoyment of the property. Interference may arise because of an omission or failure to act.

The right is usually used to protect against harassment from landlord, but it extends much further.

[–] MyBrainHurts@piefed.ca 2 points 11 hours ago

Neat, our tenancy laws pretty much borrow that word for word!

In this case, loud neighbouts, failure to act would mean not calling law enforcement.

Or letting the place deteriorate would generally count. But, most buildings are up to code etc and the landlord isn't expected to install extra sound proofing above and beyond code.

[–] chloroken@lemmy.ml 1 points 14 hours ago

You sound like a landlord.