And there won't be any RAM or SSDs or video cards to put it to good use.
Hardware
All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.
Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:
- Augmented Reality - !augmented_reality@lemmy.world
- Gaming Laptops - !gaminglaptops@piefed.social
- Laptops - !laptops@piefed.social
- Linux Hardware - !linuxhardware@programming.dev
- Mechanical Keyboards - !mechanical_keyboards@programming.dev
- Monitors - !monitors@piefed.social
- Raspberry Pi - !raspberry_pi@programming.dev
- Retro Computing - !retrocomputing@lemmy.sdf.org
- Virtual Reality - !virtualreality@lemmy.world
Rules (Click to Expand):
-
Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about
-
Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.
-
No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.
-
Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.
-
Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).
-
If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.
Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0
AMD TDP 55W.
Intel TDP NA².
That basically makes the comparison worthless.
Yes it's a bit faster, but if the TDP is higher, it's a totally moot point. Obviously AMD can make chips faster at higher TDP too.
They've caught up though and from what I read intel has some really good battery management baked in
Last I heard Intel had a lot worse PPW than AMD, especially on multi-threading, also CPU Mark is not a very good benchmark AFAIK. The indication of the test if you miss the TDP part is that Intel has not only caught up but also surpassed AMD.
That would be great if true, but this test does not have enough info to be worth much. Let's wait and see when the real data arrives.