this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2026
19 points (95.2% liked)

No Stupid Questions

45601 readers
1722 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I remember learning that trademarks that have been genericized (like Band-Aid, Popsicle, Velcro, Clorox, etc) are at risk of losing their trademark or copyright.

Can someone explain to me how exactly does this work? Cause i never really understood this

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] disregardable@lemmy.zip 18 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Trademark inherently can’t be generic. It has to refer to something distinct.

For example, apples have nothing to do with computers, so the name makes you think of the exact brand Apple computers. But if you tried to trademark your apple company Apple, that would be taking away the ability of competitors to describe the product they’re selling. Which is not ok.

So, when your brand name becomes the common word to describe a product, you have to stop your competitors from using your name to advertise their products in the first place. Otherwise, your brand name doesn’t just refer to your products, so it’s not distinct. You’ve become Apple apples.

It's funny you picked Apple computers because they were in a legal fight with Apple records of Beatles fame who've been around longer and were only allowed to keep the name if they stayed out of the music business. Which went well until iTunes and then they found themselves back in the lawsuit.

[–] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I get that a company would want to stop other companies using the genericized trademark. But is there any problem for consumers?

As far as I can tell, you can still buy Kleenex brand Kleenex's and Q-tip brand Q-tips, and coke brand coke.

[–] disregardable@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago

No, this is just a legal question about the degree to which companies are allowed to restrict their competitors' marketing.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk -1 points 1 week ago

Hence the Sci-Fi channel’s rebrand to SyFy.

[–] DomeGuy@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

A trademark is a distinct way to refer to a business. The whole set of legal rights and privileges that this weird form of intellectual property gets are to make sure that when somebody talks about " dome guys tacos" they're definitely talking about my tacos and not yours or some other persons.

If I let dumb guys tacos become a generic term that I don't say hey, that's not talking about my tacos anymore. Don't do that then I've let my trademark become generic. This is unlikely to happen to actual tacos but if I had come up with a brand new pseudo taco dish and I called it the DCT, and then every Mexican restaurant in the country copied it and also called it the DCT, then the idea has become genericized and I can't. Then at the end of it start trying to collect money from other people for calling the thing I invented and failed to produce by the name that has been attached to it.

This is of course entirely apart from the menu of how to create a DCT, we should be covered by copyright, or the specific set of instructions on how to create a DCT, which hypothetically I could get a patent on. (Although I don't think they award patents for food.)

[–] cerement@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Devial@discuss.online 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

TIL thar Heroin is a generisized trademark

[–] th3dogcow@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is a Velcro commercial, in case anybody else thought about clicking the link.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 1 points 1 week ago

Ahem... It's a HOOK AND LOOP commercial. 😌

[–] yogurt@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Trademarks aren't supposed to be a gift to the company, they're a service to the public to help them know what they're buying so they don't get tricked into buying a counterfeit. If nobody expects velcro to come from one specific manufacturer anymore, that trademark isn't serving the public and there's no reason for it to be protected.

The Band-Aid company really really wants people to go to the store to buy some band-aids, but then only one box says "Band-Aid" on it so they buy that one because they don't know what "adhesive bandages" are. They love that, it's just illegal. So they have to make sure to run enough "BAND-AID(TM) BRAND ADHESIVE BANDAGES" ads to have a defense in court that no reasonable person is buying Band-Aid because they think that's the only band-aid in the store. But they still want as many unreasonable people doing that as possible.