this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2026
881 points (98.7% liked)

Comic Strips

23499 readers
1553 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

Rules
  1. πŸ˜‡ Be Nice!

    • Treat others with respect and dignity. Friendly banter is okay, as long as it is mutual; keyword: friendly.
  2. 🏘️ Community Standards

    • Comics should be a full story, from start to finish, in one post.
    • Posts should be safe and enjoyable by the majority of community members, both here on lemmy.world and other instances.
    • Any comic that would qualify as raunchy, lewd, or otherwise draw unwanted attention by nosy coworkers, spouses, or family members should be tagged as NSFW.
    • Moderators have final say on what and what does not qualify as appropriate. Use common sense, and if need be, err on the side of caution.
  3. 🧬 Keep it Real

    • Comics should be made and posted by real human beans, not by automated means like bots or AI. This is not the community for that sort of thing.
  4. πŸ“½οΈ Credit Where Credit is Due

    • Comics should include the original attribution to the artist(s) involved, and be unmodified. Bonus points if you include a link back to their website. When in doubt, use a reverse image search to try to find the original version. Repeat offenders will have their posts removed, be temporarily banned from posting, or if all else fails, be permanently banned from posting.
    • Attributions include, but are not limited to, watermarks, links, or other text or imagery that artists add to their comics to use for identification purposes. If you find a comic without any such markings, it would be a good idea to see if you can find an original version. If one cannot be found, say so and ask the community for help!
  5. πŸ“‹ Post Formatting

    • Post an image, gallery, or link to a specific comic hosted on another site; e.g., the author's website.
    • Meta posts about the community should be tagged with [Meta] either at the beginning or the end of the post title.
    • When linking to a comic hosted on another site, ensure the link is to the comic itself and not just to the website; e.g.,
      βœ… Correct: https://xkcd.com/386/
      ❌ Incorrect: https://xkcd.com/
  6. πŸ“¬ Post Frequency/SPAM

    • Each user (regardless of instance) may post up to five (5 πŸ–) comics a day. This can be any combination of personal comics you have written yourself, or other author's comics. Any comics exceeding five (5 πŸ–) will be removed.
  7. πŸ΄β€β˜ οΈ Internationalization (i18n)

    • Non-English posts are welcome. Please tag the post title with the original language, and include an English translation in the body of the post; e.g.,
      SΓ­, por favor [Spanish/EspaΓ±ol]
  8. 🍿 Moderation

    • We are human, just like most everybody else on Lemmy. If you feel a moderation decision was made in error, you are welcome to reach out to anybody on the moderation team for clarification. Keep in mind that moderation decisions may be final.
    • When reporting posts and/or comments, quote which rule is being broken, and why you feel it broke the rules.
Banned Artists

The following artists are banned from the community.

  1. Jago
  2. Stonetoss

It should be noted that when you make reports, it is your responsibility to provide rational reasoning why something should be removed. Saying it simply breaks community rules is not always good enough.

Web Accessibility

Note: This is not a rule, but a helpful suggestion.

When posting images, you should strive to add alt-text for screen readers to use to describe the image you're posting:

Another helpful thing to do is to provide a transcription of the text in your images, as well as brief descriptions of what's going on. (example)

Web of Links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Diddlydee@feddit.uk 65 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

She is one of the best movie baddies, and her name is marvellous.

[–] otacon239@lemmy.world 56 points 3 months ago (6 children)

I recently rewatched the original and had forgotten just how well they portray her evil. Even as an adult I was actively repulsed the same way I would be if I met her in real life. Classic Disney definitely had some incredible villain writing.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] markz@suppo.fi 64 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Didn't they make one recently where they tried to spin the villain solely known for turning puppies into purses as good?

[–] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 44 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Yep and they do that by making it not even believably the same character.

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's probably how the real Cruela would tell her backstory, making herself the victim

[–] Nangijala@feddit.dk 11 points 3 months ago (4 children)

I think the real cruella would be too proud to make a sobstory about how much of a victim she is. She's the kind of narc who would brag and totally own how awful she is because in her mind, she's not doing anything bad and she's the best and coolest person ever.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Jesus_666@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

They explore an alternate story. Sometimes they do that and explore fun scenarios like "what if Cruella DeVil was a somewhat decent person" or "what if all the heroes lived together and operated a magical ghetto and also brought their enemies back from the dead specifically so they could force them to live in squalor in the ghetto forever". Fun little alternate stories.

[–] Not_Dav3@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Sorry, which movie is that second one?

[–] Jesus_666@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The Descendants series. The setting is basically as I described, except of course that the ghetto is heavily romanticized and the squalor mostly amounts to people having a vaguely punk aesthetic (as opposed to the preppy good guy kingdom). They're Disney movies for kids, after all, but they do acknowledge that their own setting is fucked up.

The premise of the story is that someone realizes that the villains had kids in there and that punishing the kids for their parents' misdeeds might possibly be kind of cruel so a few of them are selected to attend school in the good guy kingdom as an experiment. This results in a lot of choreographed song and dance routines, a romance plot, and some semi-self aware criticism of the "villains get punished harshly, heroes live happily ever after" trope.

The first one was pretty decent, the sequels were okay even if they effectively sidelined three of the four protagonists. They also made an animated series, which was a complete dumpster fire.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] viral.vegabond@piefed.social 9 points 3 months ago

Cruella was excellent, in my opinion of course 😁

[–] BurgerBaron@piefed.social 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Yeah and it's pretty good I thought. Shits on the old story but I care not.

[–] MimicJar@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The movie itself is excellent. However there is one horrible almost meme like scene where dalmatians run into a fancy party and kill Cruella's mother. If you ignore that scene, it's a great movie.

[–] viral.vegabond@piefed.social 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It might actually be a good thing that they made the dalmatians seem very mean/vicious.

The original movies were so popular that it actually caused a big problem for the breed. Many people got dalmatians without doing their research first. They're a very active breed, and require lots of exercise. Without proper exercise and socialization, they can become quite the trouble makers and this kind of gave them a bad reputation...

[–] Venator@lemmy.nz 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Without proper exercise and socialization, they can become quite the trouble makers

that's pretty much true of any dog... but I guess dalmatians even more so?

[–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 7 points 3 months ago

Not really "more so" just "more likely to become" as the minimum requirements are higher and thus easier to fail to meet.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 48 points 3 months ago (2 children)

This is something Christi Noem would say about 101 Dalmatians….

[–] ruuster13@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 months ago

You miss 101% of the shots you don't take.

[–] MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Just 100 Dalmatians for her

[–] RedFrank24@piefed.social 46 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I wouldn't call her entrepreneurially minded. She fully intended just to make a single coat and keep it herself. If she were intending on making it a business, she should have been setting up a Dalmatian farm with the 101 puppies and then mass produce the coats. Inbreeding health defects don't matter all that much when you're just gonna be skinning any puppies born within weeks.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 18 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Ah, a player of Dwarf Fortress.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 22 points 3 months ago (6 children)

The comic may be a joke, but I feel like this is an issue in diversity.

Take an author who has three characters. They want better representation, so one white character becomes black.

But, it turns out that character gives a third-act betrayal. Now it’s playing up the theme that black people are deceptive and untrustworthy.

Or, they try making the second character a woman. In a key conflict, that character pulls a very stupid move that lets the bad guys get away and results in an exciting chase scene. Now it evokes the idea that women are stupid and ill-suited to detective/enforcement work.

I really want a world where we can safely set up characters for moments of failure, evil, etc, without large crowds either feeling offended, feigning offense, or worse, taking it as validation of their bigotry.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 39 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Weirdly, there's a relevant XKCD that summarizes this really quite well:

[–] BigBananaDealer@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

when hasnt there been a relevant xkcd πŸ˜‚

[–] MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I don't get why it's always assumed that a particular character is intended to represent an entire gender or race.

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago (3 children)

One of the ones I remember the most is in the original COD4: Modern Warfare. A blog highlighted so savagely the fact that your squad is sent down to rescue a female chopper pilot who's been downed and wounded. Then, a nuke goes off, killing everyone, suggesting they could have gotten out of the blast radius if they didn't save her - meaning a woman in distress was the death of the whole squad. The blog lambasted Infinity Ward for giving such a horrible treatment to the game's only major female character.

Of course, that's a relatively disingenuous interpretation. That same mission has you rescuing whole squads of pinned soldiers moments before (all men). The chopper pilot gets her great moments of heroism in the process. And it's very likely the writers intended for the squad to be killed by a nuke no matter what happens.

And there have probably been COD games out there with NO notable women in them. So somehow, the move to include one in this particular game struck them as worse than if they'd done nothing at all.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

I really want a world where we can safely set up characters for moments of failure, evil, etc, without large crowds either feeling offended, feigning offense, or worse, taking it as validation of their bigotry.

It's a real Heads-I-Win / Tails-You-Lose game, because the White Male Anti-Hero gets the exact opposite treatment. If you make a Sopranos or a Wolf of Wall Street or a Fight Club, the very obviously corrupt and villainous lead character somehow ends up being this celebrity icon for reactionaries.

The same people complaining that John Boyega and Daisy Ridley ruined Star Wars will come out cheering for Adam Driver while claiming Imperialism is cool now.

Anything that makes a story exciting or different - the ups and downs of the story arc, characters with personal flaws or quirks, foreign settings and distinct cultures, non-English languages, non-CisHet romances - become at once implicit indictments of the out groups and charming complements toward the in-groups.

And a lot of that just boils down to the critics themselves. Far-right media amplifying its megaphone year after year, until we're deaf from their screamed opinions. There's no right answer for a film maker or story writer when the designated state-sanctioned censors and corporate flaks are all patriarchal white nationalists.

[–] Noodle07@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The movie Tallulah, I watched it completely hungover and one thing I noticed is that there is only 1 guy in the movie and he solves EVERYTHING by just being the only rational person. There's a lot of things happening between all the girls in the movie but there is one angle where it really looks like "girls crazy, man rational"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I really want a world where we can safely set up characters for moments of failure, evil, etc, without large crowds either feeling offended, feigning offense, or worse, taking it as validation of their bigotry.

Yes, the world would be much better without racism, sexism, etc. That's why we resist.

[–] MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

I don't know if resistance should be restricting creative freedom to the point where every character MUST be considered a representation of millions of people.

That's less equality and more just a new form of racially-based control.

[–] Ryanmiller70@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 months ago

Yeah this tends to also create the problem a lot of writers fall into when having a more diverse cast where non white cis male characters come off as too perfect. They can't make mistakes, big or small, cause they're worried about the examples you gave (not saying you're implying this). I know I've heard from a lot of people on the topic of representation that they'd loveless perfect representation, but that's a hard thing to walk especially if funds aren't allocated to maybe get a consultant on the team that could help represent that group without it being stereotyped.

[–] joyjoy@lemmy.zip 17 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I like how the recent movies had Cruella step on another villain-coded woman to get to the top.Β 

[–] bampop@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

How else are you going to do another pre-prequel where we find out the villain-coded woman of that movie was herself just a strong female and a product of harsh circumstances?

[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Also didn't Cruella employ two career criminals and literally stole the puppies and even complained that there were cops all over the place looking for her and her two stupid henchmen?

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 3 months ago (7 children)

Yeah, sounds like capitalism to me

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 months ago

Great movie for describing the reality of "entrepreneurship".

[–] Nangijala@feddit.dk 8 points 3 months ago

The most shocking thing in this comment section is that there are people here who think the Emma Stome remake was "excellent".

No wonder Hollywood keeps getting away with making slop.

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί