this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2026
-49 points (9.8% liked)

Showerthoughts

39181 readers
893 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I just noticed the "no politics" rule, despite being constituted as a shower thought. If a mod believes this to be a violation, I understand.

I think COVID gave big-tech a rather HUGE boost, as it restricted non-tech businesses, while actively promoting tech as the substitute. As for safety hysteria, I want to clarify I don't believe COVID itself was pure hysteria, although I do believe policy makers overstepped, and in turn caused excessive harm to youth for instance. Instead I'd argue the hysteria for COVID surrounding safety, extends into modern society, and is applied to subjects like social media bans and occupancy levels at buildings for instance. And finally for the "expert" obedience part, or rather a technocratic approach over a democratic one, can be seen in politics being "advised" by "experts" rather than by democratic will, the excessive presence of "experts" at talk-shows for instance, and the most obvious being social-media censorship surrounding COVID skepticism, as outright "misinformation". Even though a lot of it is purely nonsensical speculation of course.

Regarding technology having increasing since its inception: that may be true, however I would argue the COVID pandemic having expanded its influence drastically, also in areas previously unexplored. Need an appointment at the barber? Got to plan that using a digital calendar on their website. Need some groceries? Oh, we can now just DoorDash. Have a job interview? Have a Zoom call instead of coming over in person. And I could go on, and on, and on. And regarding your last point, perhaps my issue lies more with the enforcement of expert opinions, and them being presented as ultimate truths, disregarding people’s own opinions. Although I do agree genuine experts to be valuable, there’s also a lot that pretend to be that, while having a conflict of interest.

E: clarification

top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rowinxavier@lemmy.world 12 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

First, the term hysteria is from a fairly mysoginist root, so maybe consider whether that is the best word here.

Second, for all the 8 million plus people killed by COVID it wasn't hysteria, they died. They didn't have the sniffles, they died. Dead. Not alive. There isn't really a lot that is worse as an outcome from a respiratory infection, however we have that too! Tonnes of people who didn't die have long covid symptoms, strokes, heart attacks, various thrombotic events, loss of function, and additional complications in the rest of their medical issues. On top of that plenty of people had parents, siblings, children, friends, or other people important to them die or become disabled.

Third, digital dependence? I mean, we were moving in this direction for decades before covid. It used to be nobody had phones at all. My partners grandparents remembered the house down the block getting a telephone and went over to see it. They didn't have electricity. That was less than a century ago. The ramp up of technology over the last century has been insane and accelerating that whole time. In 2004 the coolest phone was a Motorola RAZR flip phone with a terrible 0.3 megapixel camera but a stunning 176x220 pixel display. In 2024 a Pixel 9 has a 1080x2424 display and a 50, 48, and 10.5 megapixel camera. The comparison of a rifle and a spear feels appropriate. We were already heading towards more technology in our lives, it just because super noticeable during lockdowns as it accelerated a little more for a couple of years and it was more obvious.

Fourth, why the quotes around expert? There is such a thing as an expert. Someone who knows more than me doesn't have to know everything to keep knowing more than me. They can be wrong and learn new things and change their mind all while remaining more informed than I am. In fact, being an expert in a field means doing that constantly. Being at the frontier of knowledge means holding your beliefs more tentatively as you are more likely to change your understanding than an uninformed average person. The fact that they didn't know how good masks would be at the start isn't an indictment of their expert status, it is their first guess given previous knowledge. What they did after that is what makes them experts, namely changing their minds when new evidence came about.

[–] PierceTheBubble@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 hour ago

I fully agree with you comment. I can understand you've interpreted it that way, and have since updated the body to clarify this. Regarding technology having increasing since its inception: that may be true, however I would argue the COVID pandemic having expanded its influence drastically, also in areas previously unexplored. Need an appointment at the barber? Got to plan that using a digital calendar on their website. Need some groceries? Oh, we can now just DoorDash. Have a job interview? Have a Zoom call instead of coming over in person. And I could go on, and on, and on. And regarding your last point, perhaps my issue lies more with the enforcement of expert opinions, and them being presented as ultimate truths, disregarding people's own opinions. Although I do agree genuine experts to be valuable, there's also a lot that pretend to be that, while having a conflict of interest.

[–] Darkcoffee@sh.itjust.works 23 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

That's not a shower thought, that's crackhead "thoughts"

[–] Deathray5@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 3 hours ago

Maybe if you have to do work early and are severely sleep deprived?

I mean, in the US we didn't even pay attention to the experts past the first, what, year of COVID? And that year we basically eradicated the seasonal flu, which killed ~26,000 people in the 19-20 flu season in the US.That was the last time we even considered that an expert could exist.

As for safety hysteria, I don't even see masks in public anymore. Most of the time I go to a store I'm the only one wearing one, while people are dying, and being permanently disabled by COVID.

Digital dependence is something that was happening before COVID. I think the only bill I've paid using a check instead of paying online was my rent, and that's because they charged extra to pay online. It definitely increased screen time for a lot of people, but the dependence isn't set by individuals; it's set by the fact that paying by check is becoming more difficult, and a lot of businesses are going online-only.

[–] Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world 9 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I think that screen time increased for everyone during the lockdown era, and a lot of people probably continue to use their devices more than they used to. But your safety hysteria and expert obedience comments come across as a paranoid, mentally ill conspiracy theorist. Do you want to expand on those thoughts?

[–] PierceTheBubble@lemmy.ml -2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

I think COVID gave big-tech a rather HUGE boost, as it restricted non-tech businesses, while actively promoting tech as the substitute. As for safety hysteria, I want to clarify I don't believe COVID itself was pure hysteria, although I do believe policy makers overstepped, and in turn caused excessive harm to youth for instance. Instead I'd argue the hysteria for COVID surrounding safety, extends into modern society, and is applied to subjects like social media bans and occupancy levels at buildings for instance. And finally for the "expert" obedience part, or rather a technocratic approach over a democratic one, can be seen in politics being "advised" by "experts" rather than by democratic will, the excessive presence of "experts" at talk-shows for instance, and the most obvious being social-media censorship surrounding COVID skepticism, as outright "misinformation". Even though a lot of it is purely nonsensical speculation of course.

[–] Nollij@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Uh oh, it's caught in a loop.

[–] PierceTheBubble@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 hour ago

If you mean I repeat the post's body? No, it's the opposite. In fact:

It's a quote

[–] remon@ani.social 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)
[–] starlinguk@lemmy.world 1 points 28 minutes ago (1 children)

Covid is still a huge problem. It's causing brain damage, it's causing heart damage, it's causing long covid and it's killing shit tons of people.

[–] remon@ani.social 1 points 26 minutes ago

Right, but no one really cares anymore.