this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2026
103 points (96.4% liked)

Programming

25718 readers
120 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Olap@lemmy.world 38 points 1 month ago (2 children)

https://forgejo.org/

Would be nice to see federated PRs. Git is distributed after all!

[–] UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world 31 points 1 month ago (2 children)

PSA: GitHub does not have a monopoly, you are free to host your stuff elsewhere (or yourself)

[–] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] FizzyOrange@programming.dev 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Relatively minor for source code forges.

The reasons everyone uses GitHub:

  • Free, even for private repos. No ads.
  • Free CI - this is huge. Nobody else does this because it costs Microsoft around $100m/year to provide.
  • It's quite good.

If anyone can ever compete with that then I doubt network effects will keep people there.

[–] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Codeberg has free CI if your project has a FOSS license and a readme: https://codeberg.org/Codeberg-e.V./requests#woodpecker-ci

[–] FizzyOrange@programming.dev 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They're clearly not going to be able to afford $100m/year in free CI.

[–] 0x1C3B00DA@fedia.io 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Which is one of the reasons behind github's network effect.

[–] FizzyOrange@programming.dev 2 points 1 month ago

That's not a network effect.

[–] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yes, and for most of us it's easy to do so, but I'm not going to explain a noob how to add new repositories. I mean, I did, and I will do in the future, but it's not my favorite task to do.


I realized my comment was a bit ambiguous. I meant repositories like for Maven, NPM, or package managers. Having stuff on GitHub makes it a lot easier.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I know the solution. Starting this year, students will be forced to contribute to a project they use, care about or, at the very least, truly want to use in the long term. Not one they found randomly on Github.

And they're still going to find things on GitHub. Because so many things are on GitHub.

They're blaming the students for the popularity of GitHub. If they want students to not use GitHub then just make that a requirement.

[–] FizzyOrange@programming.dev 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Terrible title. The article is about the risks of everyone using GitHub. That doesn't mean GitHub is destroying the open source ecosystem. In fact it's the complete opposite - GitHub massively helps the open source ecosystem. That's why everyone uses it in the first place!

[–] Chais@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not quite. GitHub used to help the open source ecosystem. Since it's been taken over by Micro$lop it's gradually been shifting towards exploiting it.

[–] FizzyOrange@programming.dev 0 points 1 month ago

Maybe slightly, but it's still way on the helping side.

[–] PokerChips@programming.dev 2 points 1 month ago

Sounds more like it became a trojan horse.

[–] PoY@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 1 month ago

yes, and add in Cloudflare gatekeeping vast swaths of websites and you've got yourself a real shitstorm