If such sloppy work is done even in the very superficial threat reports, it casts a very bad light on the institution.
Did they just call the AI work sloppy??? 😳👿 - Slopya Nutella, CEO Microslop (Source: htxps://hallucinated-link.slop)
News and information from Europe 🇪🇺
(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)
(This list may get expanded as necessary.)
Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com
(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)
We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.
If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.
If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org
If such sloppy work is done even in the very superficial threat reports, it casts a very bad light on the institution.
Did they just call the AI work sloppy??? 😳👿 - Slopya Nutella, CEO Microslop (Source: htxps://hallucinated-link.slop)
"Enisa speaks of "human errors"
Enisa, which has an annual budget of around 27 million euros, admitted the errors when asked by Der Spiegel magazine, speaking of "deficiencies" for which it takes responsibility. "Human errors" had occurred and the AI had been allowed to make "minor editorial revisions.""
Human errors... Yeah right, not even doing the bare minimum to do your job like proof reading and fact checking the thing you did is more than a few errors. It's neglect. How is anyone supposed to trust that if the "trustworthy" source can't even be bothered to do it's damn job?