this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2026
508 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

78584 readers
3574 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from : https://lemmy.zip/post/56719476

Italy fined Cloudflare 14.2 million euros for refusing to block access to pirate sites on its 1.1.1.1 DNS service, the country’s communications regulatory agency, AGCOM, announced yesterday. Cloudflare said it will fight the penalty and threatened to remove all of its servers from Italian cities.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 23 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Corps are getting bigger than countries and starting to flex. Scary shit.

Jennifer Government and Snow Crash here we come. Except we don’t get any of the cool shit fictional cyber-dystopias do.

[–] webkitten@piefed.social 16 points 2 days ago

Don't praise Cloudflare or Italy; both are part of the problem.

[–] SW42@lemmy.world 187 points 3 days ago (33 children)
load more comments (33 replies)
[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Blocking cloudflare is about as useful as a screen door on a submarine. Unless they start blocking IPs like the great firewall of china blocking any DNS is kinda pointless. Unless maybe if the domain’s primary name servers are cloudflare but I can’t seeing any site doing nefarious things using cloudflare. Run your own DNS resolver on a VPS somewhere besides Italy.

My worry is the internet starts getting terribly segmented and not interconnected. That would be more of an issue.

[–] admant@lemmy.zip 67 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I mention it to my friends and family every chance I get. I try to explain that the digital walls they're building aren't going to keep us safe but I'm always met with tired indifference.

[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 15 points 2 days ago

about as safe as when in prison

[–] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

Yeah the worst fucking part is that theyre indifferent. They dont promote these measures, they just dont care. If they did, a discussion could be had at least.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] db2@lemmy.world 60 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Are they becoming less shitty or is this accidentally doing the right thing?

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 60 points 3 days ago (3 children)

They did as sort of positive thing while praising Elon and Vance, despite both their visions of “free speech” as being “free speech for what I like and not you”

So a hearty fuck Cloudflare, fuck American tech for one again operating in a country and refusing to follow their laws, and fuck the entire billionaire apparatus who are so deep in the circle jerk they don’t know how to come up for air and not act like fascists for 10 seconds. 

the Italian law is overly broad here, but that doesn’t excuse this behaviour. 

[–] SaltySalamander@fedia.io 48 points 3 days ago (6 children)

fuck American tech for one again operating in a country and refusing to follow their laws

Fuck government overreach. And fuck anyone defending it.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

There’s no way this was Cloudflare taking a stand for liberty and free speech. They are simply choosing to obey one less regulation. Less for them to do. Less to be accountable for. Less to special-case for one country.

These corporations hate being regulated - it could be by a direct popular ballot, not politicians, and they would still resist. Let’s not mistake corporate obstructionism for libertarianism.

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You fight government overreach by civil disobedience, not by corporatist overreach in the same manner.

If you give a free pass to corporations disobeying laws just because you personally dislike those laws, soon you'll find all regulations are pointless because no corporation follows them...

Also, there's no such thing as "governmental overreach" in a well working system that is FOR the people and BY the people. You elect the representatives, you have a say in what laws get passed. I do agree that we could do with a refresher because the current forms of representative democracy are breaking thanks to (primarily right wing) political false marketing with no repercussions, and nowadays we do have a way to have people give direct input on laws and regulations before they get passed, but that doesn't negate the fact that the government isn't supposed to be some shady ruler class but rather a form of communal governance.

[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 1 day ago

there’s no such thing as “governmental overreach” in a well working system that is FOR the people and BY the people

Nope: two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for dinner.

Coercive power can be turned against the individual democratically. A system that gives government the power necessary to protect individual liberty but also denies it authority to abuse liberties is necessary.

civil disobedience, not by corporatist overreach

"corporatist overreach" can be civil disobedience & legal challenges.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 15 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Nah, fuck Italy on this one. Capitalists demanding censorship to protect their profits are never right.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] kokesh@lemmy.world 36 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Any DNS beginning filtering anything gets removed from my Adguard Home. I will do my filtering myself. Ads and nazi websites like *.il, or whitehouse.gov for example do not load in my network.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 32 points 2 days ago (6 children)

As a European, I've really come around to a more American view of Free Speech.

Over the last few years, we get more and more laws requiring more and more surveillance and censorship to protect copyright, stop hate speech, enforce GDPR, ... We're building up this infrastructure and the population thinks it's fine. The courts go along and ask for more.

What is going to happen when a European Trump comes to power? You think it's terrible that Big Tech goes along with Trump? That Must bought Twitter? We ain't seen nothing yet.

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 56 points 2 days ago (3 children)

just to be clear, it seems like you are referring to the claimed american view of free speech, not the reality

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The US has no limits which is fucking stupid, meanwhile Canada has limits on hate speech while still being far more free than the US speech wise.

[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 1 day ago

limits on hate speech

which is bullshit: not being merely offended is not a fundamental liberty, no imminent risk of damage to an interest a person has a basic right to results from merely expressing an opinion.

such laws are readily abused

& ineffective at preventing the ideas & ideologies they oppose from taking root & gaining power. the advocates of repressive policies are only mildly inconvenienced or continue undeterred underground. the German AfD isn't struggling. far-right parties like Reform UK keep going. so, they fail to keep anyone in check while also undermining basic freedoms.

ability to justify truth & correctness is far more important than attempting to coerce conformity to correctness through dogma, taboo, & censorship. weak ability to justify makes people incompetent defenders & weak believers of correctness. individuals hone justifications & acquire competence to deliberate effectively through practice of vigorous & open deliberation with adversarial positions. censorship, even of incorrect belief, robs both those whose speech is suppressed and their audience of open deliberation they need to justify their beliefs and actions competently & effectively.

only cowards fear words.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›