this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2026
250 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

84431 readers
4514 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 63 points 4 months ago (1 children)

On my site I have long since routed requests from Amazon associated IP blocks directly to the wood chipper, so it's nice to see that I was vindicated in doing so. Their request patterns did indeed look pretty scrapey and I was wondering why.

[–] northernlights@lemmy.today 6 points 4 months ago

The unsung here of your company if they're the kind that would list products for sale online

[–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 36 points 4 months ago

Of course it does, it’s Amazon and it’s a huge American company.

They’re acting like Americans do.

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 31 points 4 months ago (2 children)

It’s like Amazon’s goal is to become the Taco Bell in Demolition Man, only without the fancy.

[–] nothingcorporate@lemmy.today 14 points 3 months ago

Fun fact, taco bell was mostly popular in the US, so in the rest of the world, another Pepsi-owned fast food chain was subbed in: Now all restaurants are Pizza Hut

[–] Iamsqueegee@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 months ago

Ugh… they keep sending the small shell!

[–] wuffah@lemmy.world 28 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Why would a retailer turn down an additional resource that drives customers to their site?

Amazon also rolled out a "Buy for Me" feature last year that surfaces products from other brands' websites and lets shoppers complete purchases without leaving the Amazon app.

Ah, that’s why.

[–] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 37 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Why would a retailer turn down an additional resource that drives customers to their site.

Why would independent artisans be obligated to sell their products through Amazon?

[–] IronBird@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

cause it's a monopoly?, and that's how they work?

amazons whole business plan is undercutting popular items by contacting suppliers/manufacturers behind the scenes to capture any new trends, you either have to have a very strong moat/control of your suppliers etc. or you will get boxed out by cheaper amazon brand eventually.

[–] BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 months ago

It sounds like it would be very easy for them to never know with this system.

Amazon seems to have jumped in as a middle man and will automatically complete the purchase on the site seemingly forwarding the item itself to the initial purchaser. They're basically just creating an invisible front end for other peoples stores and absorbing it into the main amazon interface.

[–] criss_cross@lemmy.world 27 points 4 months ago

It’s like the skievier part of DoorDash listings, where they’d list restaurants that weren’t on the platform, make deliveries for them and send angry customers to them when DoorDash fucked it up.

[–] MyTurtleSwimsUpsideDown@fedia.io 20 points 4 months ago
[–] nothingcorporate@lemmy.today 19 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Match that with the fact you can try to avoid Amazon and shop in sites directly, only to and the product come in an Amazon box from your local Amazon warehouse, and all shopping is now Amazon.

I hate places that drop ship from Amazon.

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 12 points 4 months ago

wow, tumblr is fucking garbage

from the bullshit cookie banner than doesn't have a reject button, to the persistent overlay after you clear that.. just... alright, another site to blacklist on my network

[–] PierceTheBubble@lemmy.ml 11 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

So Amazon is basically trying to overtake Google Shopping? To ultimately be able to see what consumers are interested in, beyond the products offered by Amazon. This would allow them to anticipate for trending products, make their own knockoff of it, and list it prominently on their own platform. And if the original vendors want to appear higher (still below Amazon's mind you), they'd have to pay for advertisements: which is where the money is at. Beautiful dark patterns... :)

[–] MIDItheKID@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

Yup, there it is. At first I was like "well it routes them to the sellers website, so that's good, right?"

But I had to stop and think "No. That's not how Amazon operates. What's in it for them?"

And it's this. This is 1000% the plan.

[–] IronBird@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Bezos has taken the embrace/exhaust/extinguish business plan to new heights. same thing he did with amazon delivery is the same thing he's doing with whole foods, for all these bougie health food startups.

‘Free Speech’s programs already informed me of this, & as a struggling inventor this is sneaky bad behavior, because putting these products-owners of the companies that make-sell the products would result in trapping them into having to follow Amazon illegal anti-compete practices, outside of Amazon market place.