this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2026
98 points (99.0% liked)

Europe

8383 readers
1375 users here now

News and information from Europe ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] matengor@lemmy.ml 47 points 3 days ago (3 children)

What are [the territorial claims] based on for Greenland to be a colony of Denmark? The United States is a NATO power. For the United States to be able to secure the Arctic region.

So? Denmark is also a NATO power, therefore the Arctic region already is secure as it is.

Miller is full of crap.

Meanwhile, Denmarks PM Mette Frederiksen stated, an attack on Greenland would be the end of NATO. She is right. And the pros in the White House know.

I reckon all this Greenland talk is -again- just smoke to distract us from Venezuela and the Epstein files.

[โ€“] trollercoaster@sh.itjust.works 28 points 3 days ago (1 children)

an attack on Greenland would be the end of NATO

Agent Krasnov in the White House and his handler in the Kremlin might want just that.

[โ€“] plyth@feddit.org 1 points 3 days ago

How could Putin outspend American billionaires? The world knows about Trump's past. How much more kompromat could Putin have? Pissing prostitutes is nothing.

This is an American project. Trump is owned by American billionaires. Nobody asks who the real decision makers are or why more bases on Greenland and some mining rights are not enough. Krasnov is a distraction.

[โ€“] ech@lemmy.ca 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I reckon all this Greenland talk is -again- just smoke to distract us from Venezuela and the Epstein files.

The files are out there, and guess what - nothing's happened. This was the obvious outcome for everyone not bullishly focused on it, warning about the other dangers these people represent.

You all dismissed the boat attacks as distraction as well (dismissive of the very lives lost in those attacks), and now they've bulldozed over one country's sovereignty. You really think they're just blustering about doing it again? That it's all just a "distraction"? How blind are you? You are either naively or purposefully ignoring very real and present threats in favor of a scandal that was never going to lead to any change.

[โ€“] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I don't understand what's so hard to understand about "they did X to distract from Y". Some people on Lemmy seem to think if you say that, you're somehow also saying "X isn't real and/or isn't actually of any importance". Ever considered trump doesn't give a shit about human life and saying that doesn't mean I don't?

Also, there can be multiple motivations for an action. Being a distraction doesn't mean it's not for other purposes too.

This isn't complicated.

[โ€“] matengor@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 days ago

You're right, there can be multiple motivations. It all stays in the vein of "Flooding the zone with shit".

[โ€“] ech@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 days ago (3 children)

There's obviously room to discuss any number of things happening in the world, but ceaselessly badgering on about one even in discussions about others is at best misguided and at worst purposeful trolling.

And maybe before jumping to their defense with assumptions about their intention, actually read the comment I responded to, or a single one of the endless, thoughtless replies to any of these articles that are literally just "Release the files" memes.

all this Greenland talk is -again- just smoke to distract us

The comment leaves no room for consideration - it is unequivocally dismissing the threats as nothing more than distraction in service of their own pet interest.

[โ€“] matengor@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 days ago

The comment leaves no room for consideration - it is unequivocally dismissing the threats

Hey, it was just an assumption ("I reckon that..."). I wanted to express my disbelief that the Trump administration will actually go for it and was therefore looking for other motivations.

Of course I don't know the truth, and -believe me- I take that threat seriously. But as the risk with Greenland is much much higher than with Venezuela, I guess they just throw around their bullshit and see what sticks. If there is little resistance, they might even try something. Or they are preparing for a blackmail scenario like "OK fine, we stay out of Greenland, but only if you sign this trade deal".

As someone else said here, there can be multiple motivations. The distraction aspect is also real.

[โ€“] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 1 points 3 days ago

an attack on Greenland would be [...]

This has a hidden precondition, and maybe you missed it:

Some action that is called "attack".

Remember when Russia invaded and annexed Crimea? Who was there who actually called it an attack?

[โ€“] falseWhite@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Miller should kill himself. There, I made a statement.

The USA should dissolve into individual state countries. There, another statement.

[โ€“] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

US wants Greenland, so the tech bros can build bunckers and look at all that space just asking for data centers. Make no mistake they plan taking Greenland just matter of when not if.

[โ€“] RalfWausE@feddit.org 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Ami go home... and STAY there

[โ€“] plyth@feddit.org 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

You know who first discovered America. They do go home.

[โ€“] RalfWausE@feddit.org 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You mean the Asian settlers who entered the American continent via Beringia?

[โ€“] plyth@feddit.org 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They were not Europeans, they don't count. Have you learned nothing from history?

[โ€“] RalfWausE@feddit.org 2 points 2 days ago

Ah right... my bad!