this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2026
194 points (99.0% liked)

Mildly Interesting

25200 readers
196 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zahille7@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm interested in those tripod feet things

[–] MadnessForTsar@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Matching with these avian themes

[–] th3dogcow@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Man I saw this just yesterday in the same arrangement. I thought it was cool, too.

[–] oce@jlai.lu 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] th3dogcow@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] oce@jlai.lu 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] th3dogcow@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Nope! But the store, Nico and …, is all over the country. I assume they all have the same things on display.

[–] oce@jlai.lu 1 points 1 month ago

Makes sense, would have been fun if we had seen it at the same place.

[–] AnyOldName3@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I think that might possibly be a puffin, not a penguin.

[–] ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And the red one is actually a Macaw

[–] oce@jlai.lu 2 points 1 month ago

Macaws are parrots.

[–] oce@jlai.lu 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Missing colors on the beak, could be a royal penguin too.

[–] AnyOldName3@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Each colour's a different piece of plastic, instead of being one piece with paint on, so the colouring has to be simplified, and the beak is low-hanging fruit as it's obviously a beak even if it's not as colourful as it should be. The shapes seem to be relatively detailed, though, and the beak shape is closer to that of a puffin than any penguin I can think of.

[–] NutinButNet@hilariouschaos.com 3 points 1 month ago

Oh man that is a throwback for me. I remember my dad had one just like the penguin but I think it was a duck head instead. I don’t remember the tripod feet, but that is such a good idea for an umbrella and cute with birds.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Why is the penguin the whole umbrella (handle is the head), but the parrot is only on top of the other umbrella?

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

The penguin is so much better for this reason...

[–] oce@jlai.lu 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Maybe a contradiction between the animal shape and the design requirements for the handle. If they had given the parrot a long neck, it would have looked like an overly stretched out parrot.