this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2025
125 points (97.0% liked)

UK Politics

4521 readers
307 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

On 5 January I will go on trial at Kingston Crown Court charged with an offence under Section12 of the Terrorism Act 2000. The maximum penalty if found guilty is 14 years in gaol. There are others due to follow me.

You might be forgiven for thinking that my ‘offence’ was preparing a bomb intended for the Israeli Embassy. In fact, it was disagreeing with government policy and received opinion.

I was arrested on 20 December 2023 by Counter-Terrorism Police in a dawn raid under the Terrorism Act 2000. My ‘crime’ was posting a tweet, one month previously, saying that I supported the Palestinian resistance against the Israeli Defence Forces.

The anti-terrorism police are reminiscent of the Thought Police (Thinkpol) in George Orwell’s 1984, who spent their time hunting down “thought crime.” Britain’s equivalent of seized my electronic devices – computers, laptop, mobile phone etc. When I applied to the courts to recover these items, the police justified their retention by saying that they provided a ‘highly relevant insight’ into my mind.

The aim of Orwell’s Thought Police was to enforce mental conformity, ensuring citizens police their own minds. In his Expert Witness Statement in the Case for the Deproscription of Hamas, Jonathan Cook, a journalist who has worked on The Guardian, The Observer and The Times amongst other papers and a recipient of the Martha Gellhorn Special Prize for Journalism in 2011, wrote:

Over the past several months, I have been watching with growing professional alarm – and personal trepidation – what I can only describe as a campaign of political intimidation and persecution of a number of journalists in the UK. The journalists who have been targeted share one thing in common: they report and comment on Israel’s actions in Gaza from a critical perspective that judges those actions to be genocidal…

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gedhrel@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

At least the potential sentence is long enough to get a jury.

[–] Nimux2@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

At that point one might as well become an actual terrorist.

[–] PunkMonk@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Please stop using George Orwell for similes & metaphors. His works were pushed by the West as anti-communist propaganda, portraying a false equivalence of the far left being just as bad as the far right. There are plenty of better sci-fi dystopia authors out there which are overshadowed by this pathetic man.

But aside from that, fuck this fascist government and I wish you all the best with your case

[–] bob@feddit.uk 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A genuine question; why do you consider George Orwell a 'pathetic man'?

[–] PunkMonk@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)
[–] bob@feddit.uk 1 points 15 hours ago

I'm not convinced, I couldn't get to the end of that video, it's a load of out of context ramblings. Yes he might not be a saint, but we're also talking about a period that was 100 years ago, we can appreciate a novel without worshipping the author. In the same way we can dislike it without slamming him, I think calling him a 'pathetic man' is a bit much.

No step on snek etc