This is the logical endpoint of both "lost profits are theft" rhetoric and anti-BDS laws and rhetoric
this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2025
49 points (100.0% liked)
Pop Culture
90 readers
25 users here now
founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
Remember when they were raising a stink about “Muh freedumz to refuse service for any reason!?!”
CHUDs should count themselves lucky that not only are courts stacked in their favor, but their opponents are literally too nice for their own good.
I'd hardly describe the Dems as letting chuds run wild due to the former being too nice. The Dems are using marginalized people as human sacrifices under the pretense of bipartisanship because they clearly like a lot of what the Republicans are doing.
Oh, don’t get me wrong, dem politicians suck but I’d be willing to wager many of their voters are true believers in civility and crap like that.
I'm guessing the threatened lawsuit is for plain-old breach of contract, not anything new.
Holy shit I thought the name change was just a bit someone posted here not something that actually happened 
They literally just put Donald Trump's name right above the John F Kennedy memorial text.
It’s weird they kept the “memorial” part
The fucking article doesn't mention if the lawsuit has any actual basis. And I'd really like to know that plus actual details like how much Redd might have to spend defending himself from this shit. And - of course - the article doesn't say a word about Trump using the courts as legal cudgel to create a chilling effect.
This is pretty unheard of for someone to be sued by the government for refusing to do compelled speech. I'm sure some high powered lawyer will do it pro bono.
I'm not a lawyer but I'd think the simplest thing would be breach of contract if there was one.
Trump Kennedy Center
