this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2025
43 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

8989 readers
459 users here now

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

President Donald Trump has announced a pardon for former Colorado county clerk Tina Peters, currently serving a nine-year jail sentence for her part in the plot to overturn Joe Biden’s 2020 election win.

However, Trump’s clemency gesture carries no weight, as Peters, 70, was convicted on state charges, not federal charges.

all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CM400@lemmy.world 29 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They’re prolly going to take it to the Supreme Court and change things again.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)

I'm sure they'll try. The extent of presidential pardon power is pretty cut and dry in the US Constitution, though.

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 months ago

so too is birthright citizenship, but the supreme court is going to consider it anyways.

[–] antifa_ceo@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This admin wipes its ass with the constitution. We have functionally been without a constitution for months now IMO.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Oh, I know, but the Supremes have been less likely to support Donald when they can't hide behind ambiguity.

But at the same time, we're watching the judiciary effect change and a measure of meaningful opposition and have since January. The courts just move slower than executive orders, and Democrats in Congress don't do anything whatsoever to stop it, so it feels like there's no meaningful opposition at all.

But there is.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

There are a lot of things that ought to be obvious based in how the Constitution is written -- like how Presidents should not be able to harvest funds from foreign officials while in office, or that Presidents should not have license to break the law with impunity. This Supreme Court always finds a way to twist logic to favor the Administration's view.

Next up is the Birthright Citizenship thing. Let's see how that "cut and dry" thing goes.

And once this pardon gets to the Supremes, they will of course rule that it makes total sense for Presidents to pardon State crimes, because it's what the Founders wanted all along. Then there will be 6 shiny new RVs parked in the majority justices' driveways.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Yep, this SCOTUS is a mixed bag and often doesn't make any sense. We'll see what happens.

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 2 points 2 months ago

What’s the big deal? They like going to Walmart!

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The voters ask for affordability, and this motherfucker spends his time doing symbolic, meaningless bullshit while pilfering the national treasury to enrich himself and his shitbag kids.

But still...

Eat shit, die, and rot a cell, bitch.

[–] Nollij@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 months ago

That's the basic premise of the entire culture war bullshit. It's all a distraction, meant to create an "Us vs. them" mindset.

[–] grimpy@lemmy.myserv.one 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Might I add: “rot all yer damn cells, ye driveling hate-spewing bagbaw & all yer worthless thieving degenerate nepo baby spawn while yer all at it”