this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2025
237 points (99.2% liked)

Programmer Humor

39880 readers
168 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Got logged out of github for some reason, and the entire top bar turns into some lunatic marketing nightmare from a parallel universe. This is easily the sanest submenu.

all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Blisterexe@lemmy.zip 50 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

the "Why, github?" made me lol, thank you.

That menu is kind of insane though, especially how the useful stuff was clearly moved so you would click on the new stuff by accident.

[–] fnrir@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

so github doesn't work on a contingency basis?

[–] theOneTrueSpoon@feddit.uk 3 points 1 month ago

No, money down

[–] rozodru@pie.andmc.ca 34 points 1 month ago (1 children)

one of the many reasons I switched to codeberg and my own forgejo instance.

Github is garbage. if you can, get off it.

[–] Bababasti@feddit.org 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Looking at the company I work for: moving from a selfhosted GitLab instance to go all in on GitHub

:(

[–] witness_me@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

My employer is moving from a self hosted enterprise GitHub to Microsoft hosted GitHub. It’s the worst honestly and I don’t get the justification.

[–] moonshadow@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 month ago

To steal your labor and use it to train their clanker replacement

[–] ms_lane@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] dan69@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago
[–] dumples@midwest.social 21 points 1 month ago

I love Github Copilot. It fixes all of my spell errors in comments. Totally worth billions of dollars

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 15 points 1 month ago

Because Microsoft

[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 month ago

codeberg has the stuff in green but none of the stuff in red :)

[–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Why are you including codespaces in there??? That's a feature I wish more open-source projects made use of. Pristine working dev environments, on demand? Yes please

[–] theOneTrueSpoon@feddit.uk 6 points 1 month ago

Yeah, I was thinking that sounds pretty handy actually

[–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

https://github.com/gitpod-io

This was the best project I was following in the space

[–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Eclipse che was, afaict, the first to really make major progress in this space.

Vscode and codespaces basically stole the whole thing... But then they actually provided it in a way that was easy to use.

So while I don't like the theft, I think that the result is great, and I don't like that OP lists it as something nobody wants.

[–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

Right! Tbh I saw their work after playing with git pods on a project that utilized it. By that point though the git pods project had made significant progress IMHO from the fork of Eclipse

[–] deltaspawn0040@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 month ago

For-profit will never be for you.

[–] Hirom@beehaw.org 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I mostly agree. But would be more nuanced regarding Github Advanced Security.

Most features grouped under "Advanced Security" looks quite useful https://docs.github.com/en/get-started/learning-about-github/about-github-advanced-security Sadly Microsoft has to sneak copilot in there, but the rest of it looks good.

It's probably possible to get most of these features while avoiding copilot by staying away from Github. There are other code hosting platforms, and most support CI pipelines. Scans can be added to pipelines even if those platforms don't support scans out of the box.

[–] Tenderizer78@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

GitHub Advanced Security seems useful. AI has successfully found security vulnerabilities that would've otherwise gone undetected, and as a rule of thumb all security vulnerabilities need to be found and patched.

[–] barubary@infosec.exchange 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

"AI" has also successfully found security vulnerabilities that don't exist.

[–] Tenderizer78@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Better a false positive than false negative, as long as people aren't submitting AI generated bug bounty reports to projects and hiding the fact they're AI.

[–] Badabinski@kbin.earth 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Tenderizer78@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago

My point was that those kinds of reports are useless, this kind of feature is only useful if experienced devs voluntarily use it.

[–] monk@lemmy.unboiled.info 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I take it you're not the one triaging the subsequent slop. I am.

[–] Tenderizer78@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 weeks ago

That's because the feature is being abused by others.

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

but you can check them off as work done for managers that don't understand it. lol