this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2025
544 points (98.2% liked)

Buy European

7697 readers
480 users here now

Overview:

The community to discuss buying European goods and services.


Matrix Chat of this community


Rules:

  • Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. No direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments.

  • Do not use this community to promote Nationalism/Euronationalism. This community is for discussing European products/services and news related to that. For other topics the following might be of interest:

  • Include a disclaimer at the bottom of the post if you're affiliated with the recommendation.

  • No russian suggestions.

Feddit.uk's instance rules apply:

  • No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia or xenophobia.
  • No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.
  • No harassment, dogpiling or doxxing of other users.
  • Do not share intentionally false or misleading information.
  • Do not spam or abuse network features.
  • Alt accounts are permitted, but all accounts must list each other in their bios.
  • No generative AI content.

Useful Websites

Benefits of Buying Local:

local investment, job creation, innovation, increased competition, more redundancy.

European Instances

Lemmy:

Friendica:

Matrix:


Related Communities:

Buy Local:

Continents:

European:

Buying and Selling:

Boycott:

Countries:

Companies:

Stop Publisher Kill Switch in Games Practice:


Banner credits: BYTEAlliance


founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] Fokeu@lemmy.zip 2 points 11 hours ago

They're compensating their small dicks with big cars

[โ€“] Scrollone@feddit.it 44 points 4 days ago (3 children)

We need to limit the size of cars that can enter our cities. Seriously.

It can also be done in an indirect way, e.g. by making smaller parking spaces and give fines to cars that exceed the shapes.

As and American and specifically a New Yorker I absolutely despise cars and I mean all cars. Genuenly I think if any city in America, New York should be the one that bans all cars and replaces the roads with biking/pedestrian roads. The grand majority of people here dont even own a car let alone acturally use one, most drivers here are coming in from New Jersey (probrally because the New Jersey public transportation system sucks.)

Hell I say we should bring back trams (modern European Trams) to replace the busses and expand the metro system. We dont need cars we need more options for public transportation and a greater biking infrastructure. We are so close yet so far from completely changing the image from a loud city with garbage drivers to a beautiful city with no cars.

I know many Europeans are feeling the same so for those living in cities I encurage you to demand the same from your city governments. CARS DONT BELONG IN CITIES

[โ€“] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 17 points 4 days ago (6 children)

Allow them, donโ€™t ban.

BUT make owning one so expensive and annoying nobody wants to get one.

Extra taxes, extra costs, donโ€™t let big gas guzzlers in city centres etc.

[โ€“] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Nah, just ban them.

Extra Tax and Fees just makes it a poor people tax, and rich assholes will carry on as if nothing changes. A straight-up ban makes them not appear at all.

load more comments (3 replies)

Americans are paying 100k for these fucking things now. Taking out 10 year long loans to pay for it. And then crying about gas prices on twitter. Not sure cost will stop people. People are idiots.

[โ€“] Rcklsabndn@sh.itjust.works 10 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Agreed, wasn't it a 'work truck' heavy vehicle tax break after the fuel crisis in the 70s that created these monstrosities?

(Please correct me if I'm wrong, I'm late for work.)

[โ€“] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

AFAIK yes, thatโ€™s the loophole. If a vehicle is heavy enough then the law assumes it must be for โ€œworkโ€ and thus some pollution laws donโ€™t apply.

Car manufacturers noticed this and thus the massive โ€œSportsโ€ โ€œUtilityโ€ Vehicle was born.

[โ€“] birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The solution then is to remove that loophole, by keeping the pollution laws applied there. And those who actually used such vehicles for work? Yeah, sucks, but they should complain at those car manufacturers.

Or alternatively, we classify them as trucks instead of as cars.

Close. I believe you're referring to the EPA efficiency mandates passed in the 90s that carved out exceptions for "heavy duty" trucks and SUVs, which lead to the creation of "crossover" vehicles, which started as a way to deliver car-like efficiency and features, while still minimizing development and efficiency costs by still having it classified as a "truck."

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[โ€“] merc@sh.itjust.works 10 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Some places are taxing / fining vehicles over a certain weight. That seems like a good solution. The fine should be proportional to the offender's wealth/income though or rich people will just be able to ignore it.

Certain weight and size, would be good, imho.

Have a bit looser restrictions for road freight lorries and vans, but only regarding the back if they're fully covered (instead of open), and owned by actual transport companies, with logs of what they transported, and actually used for that purpose at least 40 x a year.

[โ€“] Scrollone@feddit.it 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yes, but unfortunately not many countries have that system.

I think all of the EU should implement wealth/income based fines.

[โ€“] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

The whole world should, unfortunately people with money have a greater say when it comes to the rules, and they don't like that rule.

[โ€“] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Not so fun fact: For every 10cm in car hight theres a corresponding increase in fatalities by 22% (source)

These machines maim us, they kill us, and they cause permanent bodily harm to us. However in exchange they make us fatter, more depressed, less connected, more lonely, angrier, allow us to waste time in traffic, and enjoy cities with less green spaces.

But on the bright side when you spend a significant portion of your paycheck on these horrid machines, and some child in Africa dies for the raw resources needed to make them you can sleep easy at night knowing an automobile CEO can afford his sixth mansion and his eighth mega yacht.

[โ€“] Figlizard@thelemmy.club 42 points 4 days ago (1 children)

As an American construction worker, I'd much rather have HiLux than these monstrosities. It's ridiculous. No need for this shit.

[โ€“] scala@lemmy.ml 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The worst part is you can't see children and teenagers walking Infront of them. Which means you can't see normal cars Infront of you either. They are essentially worse than semi-trucks because they have slanted hoods, mirrors and better designed visibility and laws.

[โ€“] merc@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 days ago (10 children)

Part of why these monstrosities are possible is that pickup trucks, and most SUVs, are regulated as "trucks" not "cars" and so they don't have to follow all the same safety rules as cars.

There are some that actually have a camera in the front so you can look at a camera view of what's in front of you and blocked by the monstrous hood. I suppose that's good, but it seems like if they have to put a front-facing camera in a vehicle, they're admitting that the view out front is so obstructed that the vehicle shouldn't be legal.

load more comments (10 replies)
[โ€“] tiredofsametab@fedia.io 42 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Also out of Japan as well, please. We definitely don't need these, especially in pedestrian- and cyclist-heavy areas. (I have seen hummers trying to drive some streets in Tokyo and it's insane).

[โ€“] Havatra@lemmy.zip 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

A Hummer in Tokyo?! Honestly that's impressive, considering the width of most non-main roads there. But still, why would one need such a car in such a place? Tokyo works even better without a car at all, imho.

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Hey, I know they are dumb, ugly, dangerous and annoying, but some people in Europe have micro penisses too! Oh wait, we have Porsche for that. Never mind, fuck off with those testosterone tankers.

At least Porsches look beautiful and aren't as tall. I'd say it's a better spending of money than those compensation cars.

[โ€“] Tigeroovy@lemmy.ca 26 points 4 days ago

Wish we didnโ€™t have these big stupid things in Canada. Every dumb asshole you could ever meet has one and they all drive and park like the dumb assholes that they are.

[โ€“] Buckshot@programming.dev 21 points 4 days ago

Came back to my car the other day to find one of the trucks parked to me. Could barely squeeze into my car then it was 2m longer than my car and so much higher i literally couldn't see a thing to drive out.

Had to creep forward but i had zero visibility until my driver window was past the front of the truck. It then stuck out the space so much i needed a 3 point turn to get around it due to cars parked opposite.

I was at end of the row so had to turn across it to get out. Just totally unsafe for anyone not inside it!

[โ€“] Underwaterbob@sh.itjust.works 31 points 4 days ago (4 children)

You see a few of them here-and-there in Korea these days. They're extra infuriating here because they don't fit in most parking spaces and they'll straight-up turn a lot of two-way roads into one-way. I don't think I've ever seen one with something in the bed. Purely for show.

[โ€“] El_Scapacabra@lemmy.zip 7 points 4 days ago

The only thing I've seen people haul with these (in Europe) is their own overinflated ego. That's all they're for it seems.

[โ€“] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 12 points 4 days ago

that one way becomes a no-eay real quick when they meet somebody who calls their bluff

load more comments (2 replies)
[โ€“] klangcola@reddthat.com 14 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Are these trucks classified as cars or trucks in most EU country?

In Norway (EEA but not EU) they are trucks (due to weight and carry capacity), and require a C1 truck driving licence. Which helps keep the numbers low. Though there have been cases of importers downgrading the suspension to lower the maximum carry capacity to reclassify them so they can be driven on a normal car class B driving license.

[โ€“] merc@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 days ago (2 children)

In the USA (and I think Canada, and maybe Mexico) pickup trucks, SUVs and minivans are classified as "light trucks". That's a different category from cars. That exempts them from a lot of regulations that would seem like they should apply to every vehicle. For example, you'd think that every vehicle on the road would have to have their bumpers at the same height, otherwise when two vehicles collide their bumpers might miss. While it's true that cars have to have their bumpers at a certain height, "light trucks" don't have to follow that same regulation, and often have higher bumpers, meaning they go over the bumpers of cars and directly impact the bodywork. They also get away from having to follow emissions standards, etc.

I don't know what EU regulations are like, but I really hope they prevent the US manufacturers from exporting that loophole to Europe. They'll probably get away with classifying them as a kind of vehicle that requires the same license as a normal car. However, hopefully the EU will require that they follow other car-like regulations too, like bumper height, safety systems, etc.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[โ€“] drmoose@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago (3 children)

How can people stand to drive these. You are so limited with how you can navigate the environment with barely any benefit.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next โ€บ