this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2025
552 points (98.3% liked)

Buy European

8092 readers
482 users here now

Overview:

The community to discuss buying European goods and services.


Matrix Chat of this community


Rules:

  • Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. No direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments.

  • Do not use this community to promote Nationalism/Euronationalism. This community is for discussing European products/services and news related to that. For other topics the following might be of interest:

  • Include a disclaimer at the bottom of the post if you're affiliated with the recommendation.

  • No russian suggestions.

Feddit.uk's instance rules apply:

  • No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia or xenophobia.
  • No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.
  • No harassment, dogpiling or doxxing of other users.
  • Do not share intentionally false or misleading information.
  • Do not spam or abuse network features.
  • Alt accounts are permitted, but all accounts must list each other in their bios.
  • No generative AI content.

Useful Websites

Benefits of Buying Local:

local investment, job creation, innovation, increased competition, more redundancy.

European Instances

Lemmy:

Friendica:

Matrix:


Related Communities:

Buy Local:

Continents:

European:

Buying and Selling:

Boycott:

Countries:

Companies:

Stop Publisher Kill Switch in Games Practice:


Banner credits: BYTEAlliance


founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] Scrollone@feddit.it 44 points 1 month ago (3 children)

We need to limit the size of cars that can enter our cities. Seriously.

It can also be done in an indirect way, e.g. by making smaller parking spaces and give fines to cars that exceed the shapes.

[โ€“] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Allow them, donโ€™t ban.

BUT make owning one so expensive and annoying nobody wants to get one.

Extra taxes, extra costs, donโ€™t let big gas guzzlers in city centres etc.

[โ€“] myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 month ago

Americans are paying 100k for these fucking things now. Taking out 10 year long loans to pay for it. And then crying about gas prices on twitter. Not sure cost will stop people. People are idiots.

[โ€“] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Nah, just ban them.

Extra Tax and Fees just makes it a poor people tax, and rich assholes will carry on as if nothing changes. A straight-up ban makes them not appear at all.

load more comments (3 replies)
[โ€“] Rcklsabndn@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Agreed, wasn't it a 'work truck' heavy vehicle tax break after the fuel crisis in the 70s that created these monstrosities?

(Please correct me if I'm wrong, I'm late for work.)

[โ€“] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

AFAIK yes, thatโ€™s the loophole. If a vehicle is heavy enough then the law assumes it must be for โ€œworkโ€ and thus some pollution laws donโ€™t apply.

Car manufacturers noticed this and thus the massive โ€œSportsโ€ โ€œUtilityโ€ Vehicle was born.

load more comments (1 replies)

Close. I believe you're referring to the EPA efficiency mandates passed in the 90s that carved out exceptions for "heavy duty" trucks and SUVs, which lead to the creation of "crossover" vehicles, which started as a way to deliver car-like efficiency and features, while still minimizing development and efficiency costs by still having it classified as a "truck."

[โ€“] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 month ago

No, you're entirely correct (though it was one of many factors, that being the largest)

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] OshaqHennessey@midwest.social 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

So, pass a ban that only applies to poor people and let the rich continue to do whatever they want still since they can afford the fine?

load more comments (2 replies)
[โ€“] merc@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Some places are taxing / fining vehicles over a certain weight. That seems like a good solution. The fine should be proportional to the offender's wealth/income though or rich people will just be able to ignore it.

[โ€“] Scrollone@feddit.it 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yes, but unfortunately not many countries have that system.

I think all of the EU should implement wealth/income based fines.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)

As and American and specifically a New Yorker I absolutely despise cars and I mean all cars. Genuenly I think if any city in America, New York should be the one that bans all cars and replaces the roads with biking/pedestrian roads. The grand majority of people here dont even own a car let alone acturally use one, most drivers here are coming in from New Jersey (probrally because the New Jersey public transportation system sucks.)

Hell I say we should bring back trams (modern European Trams) to replace the busses and expand the metro system. We dont need cars we need more options for public transportation and a greater biking infrastructure. We are so close yet so far from completely changing the image from a loud city with garbage drivers to a beautiful city with no cars.

I know many Europeans are feeling the same so for those living in cities I encurage you to demand the same from your city governments. CARS DONT BELONG IN CITIES

[โ€“] Figlizard@thelemmy.club 42 points 1 month ago (1 children)

As an American construction worker, I'd much rather have HiLux than these monstrosities. It's ridiculous. No need for this shit.

[โ€“] scala@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The worst part is you can't see children and teenagers walking Infront of them. Which means you can't see normal cars Infront of you either. They are essentially worse than semi-trucks because they have slanted hoods, mirrors and better designed visibility and laws.

[โ€“] merc@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Part of why these monstrosities are possible is that pickup trucks, and most SUVs, are regulated as "trucks" not "cars" and so they don't have to follow all the same safety rules as cars.

There are some that actually have a camera in the front so you can look at a camera view of what's in front of you and blocked by the monstrous hood. I suppose that's good, but it seems like if they have to put a front-facing camera in a vehicle, they're admitting that the view out front is so obstructed that the vehicle shouldn't be legal.

[โ€“] scala@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago (9 children)

If they do have a camera, that camera works only under 10-15mph, above that it's disabled.

load more comments (9 replies)
[โ€“] tiredofsametab@fedia.io 42 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Also out of Japan as well, please. We definitely don't need these, especially in pedestrian- and cyclist-heavy areas. (I have seen hummers trying to drive some streets in Tokyo and it's insane).

[โ€“] Havatra@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

A Hummer in Tokyo?! Honestly that's impressive, considering the width of most non-main roads there. But still, why would one need such a car in such a place? Tokyo works even better without a car at all, imho.

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] Underwaterbob@sh.itjust.works 31 points 1 month ago (4 children)

You see a few of them here-and-there in Korea these days. They're extra infuriating here because they don't fit in most parking spaces and they'll straight-up turn a lot of two-way roads into one-way. I don't think I've ever seen one with something in the bed. Purely for show.

[โ€“] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 month ago

that one way becomes a no-eay real quick when they meet somebody who calls their bluff

[โ€“] El_Scapacabra@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 month ago

The only thing I've seen people haul with these (in Europe) is their own overinflated ego. That's all they're for it seems.

[โ€“] frunch@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I don't think I've ever seen one with something in the bed.

That's usually the case here in the States as well. Not to mention how high the bed sits! You have to lift stuff to shoulder height to load the damn things, lol. They've become caricatures of trucks at this point.

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] Tigeroovy@lemmy.ca 26 points 1 month ago

Wish we didnโ€™t have these big stupid things in Canada. Every dumb asshole you could ever meet has one and they all drive and park like the dumb assholes that they are.

[โ€“] Buckshot@programming.dev 21 points 1 month ago

Came back to my car the other day to find one of the trucks parked to me. Could barely squeeze into my car then it was 2m longer than my car and so much higher i literally couldn't see a thing to drive out.

Had to creep forward but i had zero visibility until my driver window was past the front of the truck. It then stuck out the space so much i needed a 3 point turn to get around it due to cars parked opposite.

I was at end of the row so had to turn across it to get out. Just totally unsafe for anyone not inside it!

[โ€“] klangcola@reddthat.com 14 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Are these trucks classified as cars or trucks in most EU country?

In Norway (EEA but not EU) they are trucks (due to weight and carry capacity), and require a C1 truck driving licence. Which helps keep the numbers low. Though there have been cases of importers downgrading the suspension to lower the maximum carry capacity to reclassify them so they can be driven on a normal car class B driving license.

[โ€“] merc@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

In the USA (and I think Canada, and maybe Mexico) pickup trucks, SUVs and minivans are classified as "light trucks". That's a different category from cars. That exempts them from a lot of regulations that would seem like they should apply to every vehicle. For example, you'd think that every vehicle on the road would have to have their bumpers at the same height, otherwise when two vehicles collide their bumpers might miss. While it's true that cars have to have their bumpers at a certain height, "light trucks" don't have to follow that same regulation, and often have higher bumpers, meaning they go over the bumpers of cars and directly impact the bodywork. They also get away from having to follow emissions standards, etc.

I don't know what EU regulations are like, but I really hope they prevent the US manufacturers from exporting that loophole to Europe. They'll probably get away with classifying them as a kind of vehicle that requires the same license as a normal car. However, hopefully the EU will require that they follow other car-like regulations too, like bumper height, safety systems, etc.

[โ€“] klangcola@reddthat.com 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The bit that's so perplexing is that in north America they are not "cars" but "light trucks" , yet they can be legally driven on a normal "car" driving licence.

Here "light trucks" are a separate, expensive, license, which is usually only taken for occupational reasons. Which is a good thing, since weight (and securing loads etc) has a massive impact on road safety.

[โ€“] merc@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

Yeah, I seem to remember that it was lobbying by farmers that had something to do with it. Like, farmers who used light trucks on their farms wanted to be able to drive to down in those trucks too without needing to get a special license. But, that might be wrong. Either way, it smells like corruption to me. They should either be cars and have to meet all the standards applied to cars, or be trucks and meet the standards applied to trucks. Allowing them to avoid the fuel efficiency standards and safety standards applied to cars, while also avoiding the special driver's license needed for trucks is unfair (or even dangerous) to everyone else on the road.

load more comments (3 replies)
[โ€“] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Hey, I know they are dumb, ugly, dangerous and annoying, but some people in Europe have micro penisses too! Oh wait, we have Porsche for that. Never mind, fuck off with those testosterone tankers.

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Not so fun fact: For every 10cm in car hight theres a corresponding increase in fatalities by 22% (source)

These machines maim us, they kill us, and they cause permanent bodily harm to us. However in exchange they make us fatter, more depressed, less connected, more lonely, angrier, allow us to waste time in traffic, and enjoy cities with less green spaces.

But on the bright side when you spend a significant portion of your paycheck on these horrid machines, and some child in Africa dies for the raw resources needed to make them you can sleep easy at night knowing an automobile CEO can afford his sixth mansion and his eighth mega yacht.

[โ€“] drmoose@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

How can people stand to drive these. You are so limited with how you can navigate the environment with barely any benefit.

[โ€“] Rcklsabndn@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The excuse I've heard is that they want visibility because everyone else has tall ass jacked up trucks they need to be jacked up too.

With that mentality, we should fit all of our toddlers and preteens with stilts and hivis vests so these poor truck owners will see them over the massive hood.

[โ€“] drmoose@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

True example of "race to the bottom"

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] percent@infosec.pub 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If nobody buys them, then they'll exit the market. American companies value profit.

[โ€“] Pofski@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

I think there is a certain percentage of the population that is a problem everywhere.

[โ€“] arsCynic@piefed.social 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I wish I could ride my bike like a Scythed Chariot and destroy all these death machines that have the gall to ride on the bike path.

I mean fuck! I hate cars and pretentious drivers so goddamn much. The only thing they have to do to accelerate is push a pedal once with less effort than moving a feather of a newborn chick, yet they for some reason consistently claim the right of way, or get it by law even. Topsy-turvy society.

โ€œI reduced the insolent crowd of carriages which cumber our streets, for this luxury of speed destroys its own aim; a pedestrian makes more headway than a hundred conveyances jammed end to end along the twists and turns of the Sacred Way.โ€ โ€•Memoirs of Hadrian by Marguerite Yourcenar (1903โ€“1987)


Scythed Chariot - Wikipedia illustration

load more comments
view more: next โ€บ