this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2025
83 points (100.0% liked)

World News

2007 readers
486 users here now

Rules:
Be a decent person.
No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, zionism/nazism, and so on.

Other Great Communities:

Rules

Be excellent to each other

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 20 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Scientific discovery is almost never “EUREKA!”, is almost always “That’s funny…”

[–] cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yes. Most important thing, biggest reason to not ruin natural world. Lots of 'how the fuck did that happen' and 'wait, you can do that?' To be found in them there ~~hills~~ rain forests/oceans/hills

[–] ApathyTree@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Biomimicry is a seriously fascinating field of study. It’s basically going “we have a problem with X. We might have solutions for X, but they are expensive and/or very impractical for Y and Z applications, where we now need them.”

And then they go out into the world and look for ways nature has already overcome the exact same problem, and figure out ways to mimic the solution. There are typically multiple avenues to explore, and the solutions are often quite simple compared to whatever over-engineered nonsense we come up with on our own.

Looking at stuff around us is really the best path forward for a lot of what we want to accomplish.

[–] runner_g@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 months ago

absolutely. my entire field exists because someone asked "how the fuck is there life on the edge of a hydrothermal vent at the bottom of the goddamn ocean?"

[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

so this whole thing about rich people consuming the blood of unborn fetuses is probably true right? that's what this is