this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2025
44 points (94.0% liked)

Computer RPG Games

734 readers
31 users here now

Community for CRPG games and other RPG gaming discussions. Witcher, Elder Scrolls, Fallout, Baldurs Gate as well as indie RPGs (Underrail, Avernum, Space Wreck etc.). Focus is on CRPGs, but discussion around JPRGs, ARPGs and hybrid games with RPG components is also welcome.

Tabletop/pen & paper RPG discussion is not a good fit for this community. Check out !rpg@ttrpg.network for TT/P&P RPG discussions.

Memes are not banned, but the overwhelming focus is on discussions, releases and articles. Try and post memes (on an occasional basis) that would make people who don't like memes admit "OK! That was a good one!".


Some other gaming communities across Threadi:


RPG Game communities on Threadi:


General gaming communities on Threadi:


Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No spam, illegal content, or games with excessive, non-artistic NSFW content (e.g. hentai or porn games).

  4. Please stay on topic, cRPG adjacent games or even JRPGs are fine. Try to include topics / games that have a strong roleplaying component to them.


Thank you to macniel for the community icon!


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 20 points 4 months ago

Considering that this was also overarching message of the first game verbatim, I don't see as how it could have come as a susprise to anybody. They weren't exactly subtle about it.

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If both Bethesda and obsidian are owned by microsoft..

Does that mean they technically could hand obsidian the ip for fallout?

[–] Agent_Karyo@piefed.world 8 points 4 months ago

Technically yes, but realistically this won't happen. Obsidian leadership recently stated that their focus is on internal franchises (to the studio). It's unlikely they would make such a statement without approval from Microsoft.

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

When people say preachy, they just mean "it has a message and is poorly written". LOTR is fucking preachy from cover to cover but no one complains because it's a goddamn masterpiece.

Or they mean woke, but those people are pieces of shit anyways

[–] Elevator7009@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 months ago

Your comment made me think about how preachers are supposed to really be effective religious orators, and now I'm wondering how it got to "has a message and is poorly written and/or heavy-handed about it." Because a lot of religious orators failed at the effective part, and things were poorly-written and inappropriately heavy-handed? Because the effective ones wielding influence were heavy-handed (but did it well) in their speeches? Were the effective ones great speakers but when you transcribe down the speech it doesn't read as well? Fun tangent to think about.

[–] murmelade@lemmy.ml -3 points 4 months ago