this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2025
63 points (100.0% liked)

news

277 readers
1005 users here now

A lightweight news hub to help decentralize the fediverse load: mirror and discuss headlines here so the giant instance communities aren’t a single choke-point.

Rules:

  1. Recent news articles only (past 30 days)
  2. Title must match the headline or neutrally describe the content
  3. Avoid duplicates & spam (search before posting; batch minor updates).
  4. Be civil; no hate or personal attacks.
  5. No link shorteners
  6. No entire article in the post body

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lps2@lemmy.ml 24 points 6 days ago (1 children)

How dare he.... Repeat the military's oath?...

[–] azimir@lemmy.ml 16 points 6 days ago

The oath to the Constitution is obviously a threat to the current administration.

[–] bagsy@lemmy.world 23 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Freedom of speach mother fuckers!!

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

Millions of speaches, speaches for me...

[–] ozymandias@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

it’s you’re write to spell speech wrong, and i’ll fight to the death to defend that rite

[–] Albbi@lemmy.ca 5 points 6 days ago

Ow my brain.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Really winning over the troops with this one.

[–] Nollij@sopuli.xyz 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The entire point is to intimidate the troops, particularly those who would follow their oath to the Constitution. It's meant to be the stick, not the carrot

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

I get that.

I don't think this will be the thing that keeps troops on his side.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

He's been out more than 8 years I'm going to bet and that's the limit for recall.

Ed: 2011.

[–] xerodin@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

If he is retired from the military and collecting a pension, he is still subject to the UCMJ.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

That's not what the laws I've find say.

[–] xerodin@lemmy.zip 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

UCMJ Article 2 lists who the UCMJ applies to. Subsection a4 states:

Retired members of a regular component of the armed forces who are entitled to pay.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

How do we know he even chose to collect, you don't have to and he's an astronaut there's a good chance he's independently wealthy at this point.

Federal law says 12 years, I thought it was 8 but it's 12 now.