this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2025
63 points (100.0% liked)

news

277 readers
806 users here now

A lightweight news hub to help decentralize the fediverse load: mirror and discuss headlines here so the giant instance communities aren’t a single choke-point.

Rules:

  1. Recent news articles only (past 30 days)
  2. Title must match the headline or neutrally describe the content
  3. Avoid duplicates & spam (search before posting; batch minor updates).
  4. Be civil; no hate or personal attacks.
  5. No link shorteners
  6. No entire article in the post body

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

He's been out more than 8 years I'm going to bet and that's the limit for recall.

Ed: 2011.

[–] xerodin@lemmy.zip 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

If he is retired from the military and collecting a pension, he is still subject to the UCMJ.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

That's not what the laws I've find say.

[–] xerodin@lemmy.zip 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

UCMJ Article 2 lists who the UCMJ applies to. Subsection a4 states:

Retired members of a regular component of the armed forces who are entitled to pay.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

How do we know he even chose to collect, you don't have to and he's an astronaut there's a good chance he's independently wealthy at this point.

Federal law says 12 years, I thought it was 8 but it's 12 now.