That seems like an unfair comparison. Tesla played a huge role in creating the consumer EV market and I imagine had to bear the burden of a lot of R&D costs. I'm sure Xiaomi is doing R&D, but they're entering a more mature market with existing supply chains and known paths to success that they can lean on.
Electric Vehicles
Overview:
Electric Vehicles are a key part of our tomorrow and how we get there. If we can get all the fossil fuel vehicles off our roads, out of our seas and out of our skies, we'll have a much better environment. This community is where we discuss the various different vehicles and news stories regarding electric transportation.
Related communities:
- !automotive@discuss.tchncs.de
- !avs@futurology.today
- !byd@lemmy.world
- !ebike@lemm.ee
- !energy@slrpnk.net
- !geely@lemmy.world
- !micromobility@lemmy.world
- !polestar@lemmy.ca
- !rivian@lemmy.zip
- !teslamotors@lemmy.zip
- !xiaomi@lemdro.id
Yeah the company that actually creates a market rarely maintains being the market leader once it matures. They always have too much debt from creating the market to be able to capitalize on it most effectively.
Also a Nazi leader
Checks out. Robo-vacs met the same fate.
Also easy to make a quick profit with endless government money.
Yeah, looking into things like BYD you can clearly see that China was willing to pump a lot of money into their fledgling EV companies (not that Tesla didn't get money through loans/car subsidies, but seems like a different scale).
Source of the whole thing is Xiaomi, so there's that. The company that leads always has the headwinds to overcome, the rest draft along behind. Not too impressive on Xiaomi's part.
Oops.
Meh