this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2025
23 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

956 readers
372 users here now

For civil discussion of US politics. Be excellent to each other.

Rule 1-3, 6 & 7 No longer applicable

Rule 4: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a jerk. It’s not acceptable to say another user is a jerk. Cussing is fine.

Rule 5: Be excellent to each other. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, will be removed.

The Epstein Files: Trump, Trafficking, and the Unraveling Cover-Up

Info Video about techniques used in cults (and politics)

Bookmark Vault of Trump's First Term

USAfacts.org

The Alt-Right Playbook

Media owners, CEOs and/or board members

Video: Macklemore's new song critical of Trump and Musk is facing heavy censorship across major platforms.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The justices took up an appeal from Mississippi after a panel of three judges nominated by the Republican president on the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled last year that the state law allowing ballots that arrive shortly after Election Day to be counted violated federal law.

Mississippi is among 18 states and the District of Columbia that accept mailed ballots received after Election Day as long as the ballots are postmarked on or before that date, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.

The list includes swing states such as Nevada and states such as Colorado, Oregon and Utah that rely heavily on mail voting.

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Can't see how SCOTUS weasels out of this. States run elections, states get to make the rules. End. Proponents of the ban are saying counting late ballots violate federal law. What federal law? Couldn't find anything scanning these articles.

In any case, how does federal law supercede state election laws? State control of elections is in the fucking Constitution.

Section 4 Congress

Clause 1 Elections Clause

The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of chusing Senators.

Yup, I live in Utah and the ballot clearly states that it only needs to be postmarked by election day.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 hours ago

A note that while the Supreme Court majority is an arm of the Republican party, the appeal that brought it there is against the 5th Circuit ruling that late ballots weren't allowed. The SC could confirm it and expand the ruling to the country, but this is also the only way to fix the lower court's bad ruling.

[–] djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Without actually funding the USPS, this will effectively kill mail-in voting. You could send your ballot in a month in advance, and it might not get counted because USPS can't be bothered to get it in until the week after Nov 5th.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 hours ago

Even if you fund it, someone could do something like a physical DDoS on an opposing stronghold by just sending all overwhelming number of letters leading up to election day. Delivery time is somewhat elastic, and delays can be politically targeted.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 12 points 7 hours ago

This is important because if you control the mail you can make ballots late, and if that means they won’t be counted then you can choose to make mail from blue counties run late on Election Day in order to drive an election outcome.

This is why Trump hired Dejoy to run the USPS before last election. He spent 6 months gutting USPS’s backend mail sorting equipment leading to huge mail delays.