this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2025
31 points (97.0% liked)

Hardware

4437 readers
107 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.


Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.


Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:

Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 26 points 4 days ago

Dear cell providers, before you get any more frequencies, how about taking care of the large, gaping holes in your coverage you promised to close in the last and pre-last round of frequency allocations?

[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 25 points 4 days ago

6 GHz will be much more useful for WiFi than for cell networks. There is already a massive amount of bandwidth allocated to cell networks, but only a few 80 MHz channels for WiFi.

The cell carriers just don't want to make use of their mm wave bands because the equipment is more expensive. The mm wave bands are perfect for cell use in high density areas because the short range allows for very effective frequency reuse.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 15 points 4 days ago

Cell providers in Europe aren't using the mmWave spectrum that they already have.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Tbh, mm wave is by definition a wireless local area network. The only question is whether it's operated by a commercial entity or by private operators.