this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2025
661 points (95.8% liked)

Technology

76774 readers
2439 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Not_mikey@slrpnk.net 173 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Before anyone starts to think there's a good guy in this story:

some have taken upon themselves to honor KitKat in distinctly Silicon Valley-style ways. Zeidan (part of cats family) has released a memecoin honoring KitKat’s legacy, and also said that he was disappointed to see others launch their own imitation tokens in an attempt to profit off KitKat’s death.

He says he's going to use the money to support local vets, but why don't you just share some links to spca to donate directly, you're providing nothing but a way for you to grift by taking the money through meme coins.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 88 points 1 week ago

Yes, this is the extra cherry on top that makes San Francisco look like a parody of itself here lol

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 22 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Or even better: Be the "good guy" by giving your cat a happy, healthy, secure, and longer life by keeping them indoors. People hate to be told what to do, and some cats love it outside, but guess what? My dog would love to eat 10lbs of chocolate. We have to look out for their best interests. This obviously doesn't mean don't ever take them outside leashed or supervised, but the fact remains: indoor cats have a better, less stressful life, and don't decimate local bird populations...

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world 78 points 1 week ago (5 children)

“While our vehicle was stopped to pick up passengers, a nearby cat darted under our vehicle as it was pulling away”

I mean, it sucks, but it could've happened with a human driver as well... and likely has happened.

I have rode in a Waymo and it shows you all the things it detects on a screen... which includes humans and small animals. It's not a perfect machine, but it probably is a better driver than a lot of people already and it's learning every day.

I suppose this incident could get Waymo to put cameras/sensors beneath the car... something that regular car makers won't think about.

But yeah, it should've detected the cat beforehand and waited for it to leave before driving off. Then again, the human passengers didn't see it either.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 23 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Then again, the human passengers didn't see it either.

The human passengers weren't responsible for driving the vehicle, their lack of awareness is a feature of getting a taxi ride?

[–] MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (14 children)

I meant that the Waymo didn't see it, neither did the passengers, so the cat could've been difficult to detect.

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Macallan@lemmy.world 42 points 1 week ago
[–] _cryptagion@anarchist.nexus 39 points 1 week ago (2 children)

“While our vehicle was stopped to pick up passengers, a nearby cat darted under our vehicle as it was pulling away,” a company spokesperson said.

I'm not super keen on robo-cars, because they're being rushed out by corporations that want to start raking in the money while using the public to beta test their platform. but let's be honest here, if the car was driven by a human, they almost certainly would have run over that cat too.

[–] khannie@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (15 children)

Mmmm. You're taking "company spokesperson" at face value there.

Let's be real though, a meeting of highly paid, highly skilled people came up with that response then it was sanitised through three more filters before reaching our eyes.

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 37 points 1 week ago (17 children)

People who keep their kids inside but let their pets play in traffic are psychopaths.

I know what I said.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] VinnyDaCat@lemmy.world 35 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Yet another reason to despise AI. Animals deserve to be safe too. We've already taken so much from them as it is.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca -5 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Then keep the car inside. Outdoor cats are not safe and get killed by cars animals.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] reddifuge@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (18 children)

Ai has a proven track record of causing less accidents, and killing far fewer animals per km traveled than the average driver.

92% fewer accidents involving animals than the average human.

Ai doesn't drink, get distracted, or smoke meth like the ml mods.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca -4 points 6 days ago

And have a nice habit of being turned off before the accident so the AI didn't cause the accident. Numbers are bullshit.

[–] sobchak@programming.dev 0 points 6 days ago

I believe these cars drive on the same roads all day, whereas people are likely to be driving in and out of areas these systems are not familiar with. I suppose a good comparison would be of a taxi driver that only operates in the same area as the driverless cars, if that exists.

[–] majster@lemmy.zip 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Kissaki@feddit.org 20 points 1 week ago (5 children)

People get jail time, what do we do with machines?

Hold the manufacturers and operators (specifically for company operated) accountable?

The machine is the product, not the operator. We don't jail classic cars either. We hold their operators accountable. The one in control. Self driving has a shift of who is in control - now "indirectly".

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] credo@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago (12 children)

While our vehicle was stopped to pick up passengers, a nearby cat darted under our vehicle as it was pulling away,

There are plenty of assholes who will aim for cats while driving. This, at least, can likely be remedied fleet-wide and permanently with a software fix. These people are just looking for an excuse to rail against automation— as if a human driver would have definitely seen the cat.

Also, keep cats inside.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] OldChicoAle@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago (3 children)

So glad I live far away from the tech bros. Must be so annoying living in the bay area.

[–] tyranical_typhon@lemmings.world -3 points 6 days ago

I've been to San Francisco and they live like sardines.

It's not as bad as LA, but they're trying.

[–] MoogleMaestro@lemmy.zip 21 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Used to go to SF for work events.

It felt like a town that once had culture that still wants to peek out, but it almost entirely covered with silicon valley monotony and misanthropic policies. It feels like a city where the people living there are the after thought, and the tablet where you order your coffee while you sit around a room where nobody makes eye contact or speaks to you is the product.

I'm sure there's a part of the city where humanity still thrives, but it should be a cultural warning to those who are adopting silicon valley cures as anything other than snake oil.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I wish people were as outraged about people getting killed by human drivers. The safety record of these cars has been no less than stellar until now.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] dan1101@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (6 children)

I'm against robotaxis but in this particular case the taxi was stopped and the cat darted under it as it started to move. A human driver would have likely hit it too.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] chunes@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Human drivers have probably killed dozens of cats since this singular incident and not a peep. People are so fuckin stupid

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›